NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Morrison & Foerster LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
July 28, 2017 | The Recorder

In-House Counsel Profile: Square Inc.'s Hillary Smith

Smith says she never gets bored as top lawyer at the San Francisco-based payments company.
15 minute read
July 26, 2017 | The Recorder

MoFo Gets Unwelcome Spotlight in Waymo-Uber Case

The deal lawyers who represented Uber in acquiring a company started by a former Waymo engineer could play a cameo role in the trade secrets trial.
23 minute read
July 25, 2017 | The American Lawyer

MoFo Practice Leader Leaves for Baker Botts' Bay Area Base

Baker Botts has recruited environmental partner Christopher Carr in San Francisco from Morrison & Foerster, where he was chair of the latter's environment and energy group and co-chair of the firm's unmanned aerial systems and drone group.
26 minute read
July 25, 2017 | The American Lawyer

Working Mother Names Best Law Firms for Women, Laments Industry's 'Glacial' Progress

The firms are eager to be recognized for their efforts, but progress in the industry overall is nothing to celebrate.
100 minute read
July 21, 2017 | Legaltech News

A Market with 'Zero Regulation': Experts Disagree on Regulator Role in Cryptocurrency

Some view the regulatory environment around cryptocurrency as burdensome, others nonexistent.
12 minute read
Harris v. Mangum
Publication Date: 2017-07-18
Practice Area:
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard R. Clifton, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Seth W. Lloyd (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Yuka Teraguchi and James E. Hough, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Tokyo, Japan; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Joseph I. Vigil (argued) and Joseph J. Branco, Deputy County Attorneys; William G. Montgomery, Maricopa County Attorney; Civil Services Division, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix, Arizona; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 15-15054

Litigant had no interest that could be protected by appointment of guardian ad litem (Clifton, J.)

July 13, 2017 | The American Lawyer

Asia Pacific M&A Volume Hits 3-Year Low; Firms See Sharp Drop in Big Deals

Newly released league tables showed as much as a 34 percent decrease in total deal value from last year.
31 minute read
July 09, 2017 | The American Lawyer

Deal Watch: Skadden Snags Top Spot for First Half M&A

Despite early uncertainty about market volatility, global M&A activity is up 2 percent compared to last year, totaling $1.6 trillion for the first half of 2017, according to league tables released by Bloomberg LP and Thomson Reuters Corp. Skadden topped league tables when measured by number of deals by value during the first half.
129 minute read
July 05, 2017 | The Recorder

Judge Turns Up the Heat on MoFo Over Files in Driverless Car Spat

U.S. District Judge William Alsup is asking whether Uber's lawyers at MoFo have violated his orders that they hand over any Waymo files in their possession.
28 minute read
Sprint Communications Co., L.P. v. City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin., 154499/14
Publication Date: 2017-07-05
Practice Area: Taxation
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Sweeny, Jr., J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For appellant: Hollis L. Hyans and Michael J. Hilkin of counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York.
For defendant: For respondents: Kevin R. Harkins, Vincent D'Orazio, Andrew G. Lipkin and Andrea M. Chan of counsel, Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York.
Case number: 154499/14

Sprint is Held Subject to Both New York City's Utility, Unincorporated Business Income

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources