0 results for ''Segal McCambridge Singer''
The Occupational Disease Exclusion: Making New Law with an Underappreciated Policy Provision
The Connecticut Appellate Court recently issued a precedent-setting hundred-page decision in the R.T. Vanderbilt v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.…Meet the New Jersey Law Firm Associates—Class of 2016
Cite as: Kampuries v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 15-CV-5061, NYLJ 1202767549342, at *1 (EDNY, Decided September 6, 2016) CASENAME Andrew Kampuries, Plaint
Top 20 Personal Injury Awards of the Year
A list of New Jersey's Top 20 personal injury recoveries, reported by the Law Journal between Aug. 22, 2015, and Aug. 19, 2016,Punitive Damage Claims Allowed to Proceed in Asbestos Case
A Lackawanna County trial judge has allowed plaintiffs in an asbestos case to move forward with punitive damage claims against two boiler manufacturers.ADA Exception for Religious Schools and Defamation Against Parents
A recent decision in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey analyzes the religious organizations exception under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. Section 12182, as it applies to private schools and also evaluates whether a school has any claims against a parent for defamation. In Sky R. v. Haddonfield Friends School, U.S.D.C., N.J., Civil Action No. 14-5730, U.S. District Judge Joseph H. Rodriguez of the District of New Jersey provides a thorough analysis of both concepts and shows that the court can giveth and taketh away.Katten Litigation Co-Leader Decamps, Plus More Lateral Moves
The U.S. Department of Commerce adds a high-profile partner from Katten Muchin Rosenman; Greenberg Traurig and Holland & Knight trade hires; Winston & Strawn's arbitration co-chair departs; and other notable additions from around The Am Law 200.Recent Pa. Decision Analyzes Fee-Shifting Under the IDEA
A recent decision in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania thoroughly discusses the fee-shifting mechanism set forth in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), wherein the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs, 20 U.S.C. Section 1415(i)(3)(B). In I.W. v. School District of Philadelphia (E.D.Pa., Jan. 13, 2016), U.S. Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania provides a full analysis of when fee-shifting should occur and what fees should apply while rendering a decision relating to plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees and costs. The memorandum opinion is instructive to both attorneys for parents/students and school districts alike.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The 2024 Benchmark of Ethical Culture Report
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now
State Lawmakers Targeting Plastic Pollution in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Leveraging Technology to Increase Law Firm Profitability
Brought to you by Tranch
Download Now
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now