0 results for ''Hangley Aronchick Segal''
Michele Hangley: Thriving in the Heat of the 2020 Election
Michele Hangley had taken on a leading role defending Pennsylvania—the most embattled of battleground states—on any election challenges, and, in doing so, had become the central node of communication not just for her firm's litigation team, but for the sprawling network of county solicitors and state and local officials embroiled in the mounting legal challenges.
Attorneys Face Patchwork of Case Backlogs, Trial Availability as Pa. Courts Thaw
"You really have to know each county, wherever you practice," said Cheryl Young of Hangley Aronchick, as courts are aim to mitigate growing backlogs after the COVID-19 pandemic broadly shuttered access to the legal system.
People in the News—May 21, 2021—Panitch Schwarze, Philadelphia Bar Association
Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel partner Travis W. Bliss presented at the American Intellectual Property Law Association spring 2021 meeting titled "Cannabis and the Law," and the Philadelphia Bar Association is set to host a virtual Chancellor's Forum celebrating the impact of Pennsylvania's Equal Rights Amendment.
New CDC Guidelines May Change Return-to-Office Policies at Phila. Law Firms
Firm leaders said they're currently considering changes, while the city also prepares for new updates in the wake of looser masking and social distancing guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The Legal Intelligencer Announces 2021 Professional Excellence Award Winners
The Legal Intelligencer is pleased to announce the 2021 Professional Excellence Award winners.
2020 Election Litigation Cost Pa. $3.4M. Here's Who Got the Work
The single most expensive case challenged the use of drop boxes for mail-in ballots. It cost the state government $1.57 million to defend.
'Relentless Lawsuits': Presidential Election Litigation Cost $3.4 Million in Pennsylvania
The state is still considering whether to seek legal fees in the cases, which included a failed attempt to overturn the election results.
Sycamore Partners Mgmt., L.P. v. Endurance Am. Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2021-03-17 Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Insurance |
Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court Judge: Judge LeGrow Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; John E. Failla, Nathan R. Lander, Elise A. Yablonski, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs. For defendant: Barry M. Klayman, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Michael R. Davisson, Cozen O’Connor, Los Angeles, CA; Elena C. Norman, Michael A. Laukaitis, II, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael F. Perlis, Locke Lord LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Michael P. Duffy, Scarlett M. Rajbanshi, Peabody & Arnold LLP, Boston, MA; Ian Connor Bifferato, The Bifferato Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; James Thurston, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Chicago, IL; Daniel E. Tranen, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Edwardsville, IL; Elizabeth B. Sandza, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Washington, DC; Carmella P. Keener, Cooch and Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Ronald P. Schiller, Daniel J. Layden, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, P.C., Philadelphia, PA for defendants. Case number: D69333
Insurers' defense of uninsurability failed as a matter of law, because Delaware law did not prohibit insur-ance policies for restitution or disgorgement.
Calamos Asset Mgmt., Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am.,
Publication Date: 2021-03-10 Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance |
Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Noreika Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jennifer C. Wasson, Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Matthew J. Schlesinger, Colin P. Watson, Maura A. Sokol, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff. For defendant: Francis G.X. Pileggi, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ronald P. Schiller, Daniel J. Layden, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA for defendant. Case number: D69318
Corporation was not entitled to coverage under Directors and Officers liability policy for stockholders' underlying action against the company where the policy only provided coverage for securities claims and the underlying breach of fiduciary duty claims did not concern regulating securities.
Northrop Grumman Innovation Sys., Inc. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2021-03-10 Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Aerospace |
Defense |
Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court Judge: Judge Wallace Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Barry J. Fleishman, Joseph D. Jean, Tamara D. Bruno, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington DC for plaintiff. For defendant: Bruce W. McCullogh, Bodell Bové, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Wayne E. Borgeest, Matthew I. Schiffhauer, Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, New York, NY; David F. Cutter, Jonathan R. Walton, Emily R. Tripicchio, BatesCarey LLP, Chicago IL; Karen Ventrell, CNA Coverage Litig. Group, Washington, DC; Robert J. Kat-zenstein, Kathleen M. Miller, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael L. Manire, Ma-nire Galla Curley LLP, New York, NY; Timothy S. Martin, White and Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sean P. Mahoney, White and Williams LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Joseph A. Bailey III, M. Addison Draper, Clyde & Co US LLP, Washington, DC; Ronald P. Schiller, Bonnie M. Hoffman, Cary L. Rice, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Scholler, Philadelphia, PA; Eileen M. Ford, Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wil-mington, DE; David H. Topol, Matthew W. Beato, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, DC; Barry M. Klayman, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Michael R. Davisson, Cozen O’Connor, Los Angeles, CA; John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Geoffrey W. Heineman, Jung H. Park of Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley, P.C., New York, NY; David C. Malatesta, Kent & McBride, P.C., Wil-mington, DE; David A. Wilford, Anthony J. D’Agostino, Wilford Conrad LLP, Barrington, IL for defendants. Case number: D69322
In this insurance coverage dispute, the court granted insured's motions as to coverage for certain defense costs, but factual issues remained regarding allocation among the insurers.
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 2AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 3Few Big Law Firms With Single-Tier Partnerships Are Left. They Aren't Talking About It.
- 4Kirkland Merges Finance Practices Ahead of New Star Hire, as Private Credit Market Booms
- 5Where Do Law Grads Get the Most Bang for Their Buck?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now