0 results for 'Mccarter English'
Natalya Johnson Proved Herself a 'Visionary' and 'Change Agent' as GSBA President
"When you can articulate a mission, people will understand and see a vision. It's a really powerful mechanism for drawing people along to join you in the journey. And it's always better together," Johnson said.Fed. Judge Who Oversaw Asbestos MDL Deconsolidation Joins McCarter & English ADR Practice
Judge Eduardo Robreno stepped down from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania bench on Aug. 31, a decade after taking senior status.New Jersey Dealmaker of the Year: Here Are Our Finalists
Read their Q&As here. The winner will be announced Sept. 13 at the New Jersey Legal Awards.McCarter & English Faces Legal Malpractice Claim
"In an attempt to save their untimely claims, plaintiffs first argue the two loans were essentially one big transaction because the loans were similar and there was a cross-default provision. They then argue the legal representation continued to August 17," the defendants said in their reply in support. "Both arguments fail."View more book results for the query "Mccarter English"
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
Court dismissed complaint seeking to pierce corporate veil where plaintiff failed to present evidence that parent and subsidiary failed to observe corporate formalities.
Plaintiff brought the underlying personal injury action against defendants alleging that defendants were responsible for developing, manufacturing, marketing, and distributing proton pump inhibitor products that were unsafe, defectively designed, lacked proper warnings, and were unfit to be marketed and sold in the United States. Defendants individually and collectively moved to dismiss the claims. Plaintiff brought the case as administrator of a health care plan directly and as subrogee of its members' claims for a variety of injurie
§510(k) Evidence Relevant to Negligence Theory in Product Liability Case, But Challenges to Admission Should Be Resolved by Motion in Limine
White Employees Are Suing for Discrimination. What Will Jurors Think?
"I still do think that jurors are going to be surprised when they walk into a case and that's what the case is," said Peter Frattarelli of Archer & Greiner.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now