Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Murphy Pearson Bradley'

You can use to get even better search results
June 16, 2003 |

Panel Blasts Pleasanton's Judge Hyde

Embattled Alameda County Judge D. Ronald Hyde gave "completely inconsistent and irreconcilable" explanations for why he abused his judicial powers, according to a report released Friday by a panel of special masters. Although the three judges found Hyde had committed "willful misconduct," it's unclear what punishment he will face. Earlier, the judge announced that he would retire June 2, which meant, at worst, the Commission on Judicial Performance could bar Hyde from sitting on assignment.
4 minute read
September 20, 2007 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
400 minute read
May 02, 2006 |

Calif. Commission Charges Judge With Willful Misconduct

A judge censured nine years ago for mishandling drunken-driving cases and disparaging fellow judges and attorneys is under fire once again by the state's judicial watchdog agency.
3 minute read
January 04, 2002 |

Critical Words Taken Out Of Context, Judge Says

2 minute read
September 26, 2011 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
413 minute read
August 06, 2003 |

Murphy's Law

The names on James Murphy's client list are usually carefully guarded secrets. However, rare public hearings involving a few of those clients -- judges accused of misconduct -- have thrust Murphy's practice into the spotlight lately. Judicial misconduct represents only about 20 percent of Murphy's San Francisco-based practice. But for his clients, it's extremely important work. Even rumors of secret discipline can torpedo a judge's career, Murphy and other lawyers say.
5 minute read
October 11, 2007 |

Pa. Bar Exam Results

The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners recently announced the results of the bar examination given on July 24 and 25. Some 2,004 applicants took the examination of which 1,559 passed (the overall pass rate was 78 percent). The names of the successful applicants follow.
16 minute read
Nemecek & Cole v. Horn
Publication Date: 2012-08-15
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney, James A. Murphy and Harlan B. Watkins; Nemecek & Cole, Frank W. Nemecek and Mark Schaeffer for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Miguel A. Muro for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. B233274

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 9313 NEMECEK & COLE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STEVEN J. HORN, Defenda

May 17, 2006 |

Campaign Mailer Raises Ire of Opponent

Judicial candidate Eric Safire was only partly right when he highlighted a ruling criticizing his opponent's handling of a murder trial. But he left out one large detail: an appeal court decision vindicating her actions.
4 minute read
September 28, 2009 |

2009 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
388 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT