NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Price Law'

You can use to get even better search results
Wu v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-07-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Contracts | Products Liability
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Hassan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 14-20-00765-CV

In 2014, appellant Wu purchased bamboo flooring from appellee Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators engaged appellee Wood Floor Artisans to install the floors.

Ammonite Oil & Gas Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Texas
Publication Date: 2024-07-15
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Civil Appeals | Energy and Natural Resources
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Hecht
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-1035

Petitioner Ammonite Oil & Gas Corporation sought to force-pool mineral interests beneath a riverbed with adjacent land leased by respondent EOG Resources, Inc. Respondent Railroad Commission of Texas denied the applications.

Tatum v. The State
Publication Date: 2024-07-15
Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Colvin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John Jay McArthur, (McArthur & McArthur, P.A.), Athens, for appellant.
For defendant: David Parks White, (Northern Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office), Hartwell, Michael Martin Coveney, (Northern Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office), Danielsville, Jeffrey Lee, (Office of the Elbert County District Attorney), Elberton for appellee; Brandon A. Bullard, (The Bullard Firm, LLC), Atlanta, Virginia Natasha Perdew Silas, (Federal Defender Program Inc.), Decatur, Hunter Joseph Rodgers, Smyrna, Mazie Lynn Guertin, (Georgia Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers), Decatur, Cory H. Isaacson, (Aclu Foundation of Georgia), Atlanta, for Amicus Appellant.
Case number: S23G0955

Court vacates denial of motion to suppress evidence and remands for determination of whether the independent source doctrine applies in a case involving a warrantless search

Nat'l Ass'n of Mfr. v. SEC
Publication Date: 2024-07-15
Practice Area: Administrative Law | Civil Appeals | Regulation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Jones
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 22-51069

Appellants, the National Association of Manufacturers and the Natural Gas Services Group, challenged the Securities and Exchange Commission's decision to rescind a two-year-old rule regulating businesses that provide proxy voting advice to institutional shareholders of public corporations.

July 12, 2024 | The Legal Intelligencer

Phila. Insurance Defense Firm, Ex-Partner Square Off Over Loans

Attorney Kevin Berry says Vaughan McLean owes him over $350,000 that he contributed to help the firm pay off a $2 million loan. Founder Joseph Vaughan responded that Berry's misrepresentations over his book of business caused the firm to incur $10 million in litigation funding loans.
5 minute read
July 12, 2024 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Loses Challenge to Inflation Reduction Act

"We are disappointed by this ruling and what it means for biopharmaceutical innovation," the company said. "Boehringer Ingelheim shares the goal of ensuring our medicines are affordable and available to people who need them. However, we remain concerned about the detrimental and limiting effects the IRA and its 'negotiation' program will have on the future of innovation for the patients we serve."
3 minute read
July 12, 2024 | The Recorder

Dovel & Luner Files Spate of 'False Advertising' Class Actions Against Companies for Allegedly Deceptive Pricing

The Santa Monica plaintiffs firm filed proposed suits against Evry Jewels, Brooklyn Bedding and Frontgate in the California Central District Court in June. All three complaints argued that the retailers intentionally used deceptive phrases and font choices to dupe consumers into believing that regularly priced items were heavily marked down during limited-time promotions.
3 minute read
July 12, 2024 | New York Law Journal

New Wine into Old Wineskins: Artificial Intelligence Fraud and Abuse Enforcement

While the DOJ is sharpening its sword in preparation for AI-related enforcement actions, health care organizations, providers, payors and device manufacturers should be donning their shields.
11 minute read
July 12, 2024 | Texas Lawyer

Top 10 Tips for the 2024 Hurricane Season

"This season is particularly concerning as it has been well covered in the media that FEMA could run out of readily available disaster aid during the height of this hurricane season," write Wendy Huff Ellard, Danielle M. Aymond and Jordan Corbitt.
9 minute read
Litovich v. Bank of America Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Judges
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Gregory Rapawy, Eliana Margo Pfeffer, on the brief, David C. Frederick, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Christopher M. Burke, Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Walter W. Noss, Kate Lv, Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, San Diego, CA. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: George A. Zelcs, Chad E. Bell, Ryan Z. Cortazar, Korein Tillery LLC, Chicago, IL. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Glen E. Summers, Karma M. Giulianelli, Bartlit Beck LLP, Denver, CO.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Matthew J. Porpora, Jonathan S. Carter, on the brief, Richard C. Pepperman II, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation, BofA Securities, Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated: Adam S. Hakki, Richard F. Schwed, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Barclays Capital, Inc.: Barry G. Sher, Kevin P. Broughel, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Herbert S. Washer, Sheila C. Ramesh, Adam S. Mintz, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees JPMorgan Chase & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC: Robert D. Wick, John S. Playforth, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant-Appellee NatWest Markets Securities Inc: Paul S. Mishkin, Adam G. Mehes, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Citigroup Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.: Jay Kasner, Karen M. Lent, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.: John F. Terzaken, Adrienne V. Baxley, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC: Richard A. Rosen, Brad S. Karp, Susanna M. Buergel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Jane B. O'Brien, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC: Jayant W. Tambe, Laura W. Sawyer, Amanda L. Dollinger, Jones Day, New York, NY.
Case number: 21-2905

Judgment Vacated; Statute, Precedents Required Judge's Pre-Judgment Disqualification

Resources