NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP'

You can use to get even better search results Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP
February 20, 2012 | Texas Lawyer

Lateral Hiring Red Hot at Large Firms

Lateral hiring at large firms in Texas was smoking hot in 2011, with 20 of the 25 largest firms in Texas hiring 46.8 percent more laterals than in 2010, according to data collected in Texas Lawyer 's annual Lateral Moves Survey. That robust increase in 2011 is considerably higher than the 10.3 percent rise posted in 2010.
36 minute read
February 05, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

In Re: Thompson, Coe, Cousins, Irons LLP

Thompson, Coe is not entitled to mandamus relief, because the firm has an adequate remedy by appeal.
3 minute read
April 27, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

Despite Economy, Ike, BigTex Revenue Rose in '08

Considering the challenges of 2008, the 25 highest-grossing Texas-based firms showed financial spark in 2008, with their combined gross revenue increasing a little compared to 2007. However, combined net income was flat.
58 minute read
October 22, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

Jurisdiction Friction: Legal-Mal Suits With Patent Infringement Elements Belong in Federal Court

When a claim of patent infringement is a necessary element of a legal malpractice suit, those suits should be tried in federal court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled in a case of first impression.
12 minute read
December 31, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

VerdictSearch

Nurse who said coworkers referred to her as "Osama bin Laden" loses case. Firm gets almost $950,000 in case against hospital over rent payments. Motor company not liable for fatal fire following highway head-on crash. Family nets more than $100,000 after man dies from accidental gunshot.
5 minute read
September 26, 2005 | Law.com

2005 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
516 minute read
April 27, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

The Texas 100 - 2009

57 minute read
October 12, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

Newsmakers

2 minute read
October 22, 2007 | Law.com

Federal Circuit: Legal-Mal Suits With Patent Infringement Elements Belong in Federal Court

When a claim of patent infringement is a necessary element of a legal malpractice suit, those suits should be tried in federal court, the Federal Circuit has ruled in a case of first impression. The appeals court upheld a ruling that denied a request by Akin Gump and a Corpus Christi, Texas-based firm to remand a malpractice suit to state court. The opinion may lead to all sorts of legal malpractice suits being filed or tried in federal courts instead of state courts.
12 minute read
October 22, 2007 | National Law Journal

Federal Circuit: Legal-Mal Suits With Patent Infringement Elements Belong in Federal Court

When a claim of patent infringement is a necessary element of a legal malpractice suit, those suits should be tried in federal court, the Federal Circuit has ruled in a case of first impression. The appeals court upheld a ruling that denied a request by Akin Gump and a Corpus Christi, Texas-based firm to remand a malpractice suit to state court. The opinion may lead to all sorts of legal malpractice suits being filed or tried in federal courts instead of state courts.
12 minute read

Resources

  • Leveraging Technology to Improve Employee Engagement and Client Satisfaction

    Brought to you by CARET Legal

    Download Now

  • How to Choose Your Legal Operations Software: Key Considerations and Expert Tips

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making

    Brought to you by CARET Legal

    Download Now

  • Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now