Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Margolis Edelstein''

You can use to get even better search results
February 21, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

Bus Driver Claimed Knee Injury Resulted From Collision With Truck

On March 13, 2014, plaintiff Craig Kulesa, 43, a bus driver, was driving a bus on west Route 65, near the North Shore exit, in Pittsburgh. He rear-ended a flatbed truck. Kulesa claimed that he suffered injuries of a knee.
3 minute read
February 20, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

Justices Won't Review Upended $32M Wrongful Death Verdict

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has declined to hear argument in the case of a vacated $32 million verdict awarded to the family of a 6-year-old boy killed in a car accident.
4 minute read
January 17, 2019 | New Jersey Law Journal

Judge Rejects Mazie Firm's Effort to Jettison Suit Over Reversal of $166M Verdict

The malpractice lawsuit accused the law firm of negligently advising a client to reject a $10 million settlement.
4 minute read
Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Tech. Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-01-16
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Intellectual Property
Industry: Electronics | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Adam W. Poff, Tammy L. Mercer, and Paul J. Loughman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven Morgans, Myers Billion LLP, Sioux Falls, SD for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Herbert W. Mondros, Margolis Edelstein, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D68422

Intellectual property licensor properly terminated agreement where licensee breached provision to take no action against or with third-party infringer by offering to sublicense IP, and then failed to comply with licensor's instructions to cure the breach.

Delawareans for Educ. Opportunity v. Carney
Publication Date: 2018-12-12
Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Education Law
Industry: Education
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Laster
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Ryan Tack-Hooper and Karen Lantz, ACLU Foundation of Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, DE; Richard H. Morse and Brian S. Eng, Community Legal Aid Society, Inc., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs
For defendant: Barry M. Willoughby, Lauren E.M. Russell, Elisabeth S. Bradley, and Lauren Dunkle Fortunato, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; William W. Pepper, Sr. and Gary E. Junge, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE; Herbert W. Mondros and Helen Episcopo, Margolis Edelstein, Wilmington, DE; Adam Singer and Mary A. Jacobson, New Castle County Office of Law, New Castle, DE; Norman M. Monhait, Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D68382

State officials' motion to dismiss complaint alleging state failed to provide sufficient funding to disadvantaged students denied where Delaware Constitution's Education Clause required state to provide meaningful public education and judiciary was empowered to determine whether legislature's statutory scheme was unconstitutional.

November 27, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Nine Unique Ways to Differentiate Your Practice From the Competition

A recent call to the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board indicated that there are over 14,000 lawyers in Philadelphia County alone. That's a lot of competition for you and your firm. A great number of these lawyers are unlikely to be hired if they do not stick out or “differentiate” themselves in some way from their competition.
6 minute read
November 23, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

The Gist of the Gist Doctrine in Legal Malpractice Actions

Our courts have long recognized a legal malpractice action can sound in tort or contract. In the last several years Pennsylvania courts have not spilled a lot of ink on the distinction between the two causes of action. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have been much more active in discussing the distinction and its importance.
6 minute read
November 01, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

$44M Judgment Awarded in Dispute Over Usher Song

A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
4 minute read
October 18, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

$44M Judgment Entered in Row Over Authorship of Usher Song

A man claiming to have been cheated out of credit for writing a song that was eventually recorded by R&B star Usher has won a more than $40 million judgment in a combined verdict and settlement against two men he co-wrote the song with.
4 minute read
October 18, 2018 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Third Circuit Rules That District Court Should Not Have Considered Policy Exclusions After Finding No “Occurrence”

In an insurance coverage case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that a district court should not have considered an insurance…
3 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT