Search Results

0 results for 'Bernstein Liebhard LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
March 22, 2012 |

Judge OKs Majority Of Claims in Egg Price-Fixing MDL

U.S. District Court Judge Gene E.K. Pratter of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued a ruling on Tuesday allowing the majority of indirect purchaser claims in the multidistrict class action litigation over alleged price-fixing for eggs and egg products to move forward, marking another setback for the dozen-or-so defendants.
3 minute read
In Re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92
Publication Date: 2010-06-30
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: District Court, New York County
Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee: Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, New York, New York David Kessler, Esq., Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check LLP, Radnor, Pennsylvania Howard B. Sirota, Esq., Sirota & Sirota LLP, New York, New York Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirstein, Esq., Neil Fraser, Esq., Milberg LLP, New York, New York Jules Brody, Esq., Stull, Stull & Brody LLP, New York, New York Fred Taylor Isquith, Esq., Thomas H. Burt, Esq., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York
For defendant: Liaison Counsel for Underwriter Defendants: Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Esq., Penny Shane, Esq., David M.J. Rein, Esq., Richard J.L. Lamuscio, Esq., Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, New York, New York Liaison Counsel for Issuer Defendants: Jack C. Auspitz, Esq., Joel C. Haims, Esq., Hilary M. Williams, Esq., Angela T. Rella, Esq., Reema S. Abdelhamid, Esq., Morrison and Foerster LLP, New York, New York For the Greene Objectors: Leland L. Greene, Esq., Garden City, New York For the Siegel Objectors: Edward F. Siegel, Esq., Cleveland, Ohio For the Pentz Objectors: John J. Pentz, Esq., Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, Massachusetts For the Weinstein Objectors: Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Esq., The Weinstein Law Firm, Athens, Texas For the Bechtold Objectors: Theodore A. Bechtold, Esq., Brooklyn, New York James J. Hayes (Pro Se), Annandale, Virgnia
Case number: 21 MC 92

District Judge Shira A. ScheindlinDecided: June 18, 2010For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee:S

In Re: Initial Public OfferingSecurities Litigation,21 MC 92
Publication Date: 2010-06-29
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: District Court, New York County
Judge: District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee: Stanley D. Bernstein, Esq., Rebecca M. Katz, Esq., Christian Siebott, Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, New York, New York David Kessler, Esq., Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check LLP, Radnor, Pennsylvania Howard B. Sirota, Esq., Sirota & Sirota LLP, New York, New York Robert A. Wallner, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Safirstein, Esq., Neil Fraser, Esq., Milberg LLP, New York, New York Jules Brody, Esq., Stull, Stull & Brody LLP, New York, New York Fred Taylor Isquith, Esq., Thomas H. Burt, Esq., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York
For defendant: Liaison Counsel for Underwriter Defendants: Gandolfo V. DiBlasi, Esq., Penny Shane, Esq., David M.J. Rein, Esq., Richard J.L. Lamuscio, Esq., Sullivan and Cromwell LLP, New York, New York Liaison Counsel for Issuer Defendants: Jack C. Auspitz, Esq., Joel C. Haims, Esq., Hilary M. Williams, Esq., Angela T. Rella, Esq., Reema S. Abdelhamid, Esq., Morrison and Foerster LLP, New York, New York For the Greene Objectors: Leland L. Greene, Esq., Garden City, New York For the Siegel Objectors: Edward F. Siegel, Esq., Cleveland, Ohio For the Pentz Objectors: John J. Pentz, Esq., Class Action Fairness Group, Maynard, Massachusetts For the Weinstein Objectors: Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Esq., The Weinstein Law Firm, Athens, Texas For the Bechtold Objectors: Theodore A. Bechtold, Esq., Brooklyn, New York James J. Hayes (Pro Se), Annandale, Virgnia
Case number: 21 MC 92

District Judge Shira A. ScheindlinDecided: June 18, 2010For Plaintiffs' Executive Committee:S

March 20, 2013 |

Court Puts New York Litigation on Hold in NYSE M&A Battle

New York Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich was none too pleased earlier this year to find herself in a tug of war with Delaware's top business court judge, Leo E. Strine Jr., in litigation over NYSE Euronext's $8.2 billion sale to IntercontinentalExchange. "Who — please tell me it's not Chancellor Strine who has the Delaware cases?" she pleaded back in January.
2 minute read
Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P., 603468/2009
Publication Date: 2011-06-23
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 46
Judge: Justice Lucy Billings
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Matthew D. Brinckerhoff Esq., Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, Dugan, D'Yans, Gagnon, Kern, McCurdy, Pelaez, Snyder, Walsh, Mack, and Zitis, New York, NY. William Gribben Esq. and Ronald S. Languedoc Esq., Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph, New York, NY. For Plaintiff Doerr: Ronald Aranoff Esq., Hanna R. Neier Esq., and Christian Siebott Esq., Bernstein Liebhard LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For the Defendant: Robert D. Goldstein Esq. and Paul N. Gruber Esq., Borah, Goldstein, Altschuler, Nahins & Goidel, P.C., New York, NY. Harry Frischer Esq., Richard M. Goldstein Esq., and Steven H. Holinstatt Esq., Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 603468/2009

Cite as: Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P., 603468/2009, NYLJ 1202498153508, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided June 6, 2011)Justice Lucy Billingsp class="

May 01, 2003 |

13 minute read
April 13, 2007 |

In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

Rehearing of IPO Class Action Issue Denied; No Reason to Revise Standard for Class Certification
7 minute read
July 23, 2012 |

Judge Delays Fee Request in Eggs Price-Fixing Case

The Philadelphia federal judge overseeing multidistrict antitrust litigation over alleged price-fixing in the egg and egg products market has issued an order on a 15-month-old motion for $7.5 million in fees filed by co-lead counsel for the plaintiffs.
3 minute read
March 19, 2009 |

May Courts Assist Private International Arbitration?

With more disputes required by contract to be resolved through international arbitrations, parties must pursue creative avenues to obtain written discovery and witnesses' testimony. One such avenue is through 28 U.S.C. �1782. Currently, the courts are split over whether an international private arbitration constitutes a "tribunal" entitled to judicial assistance under �1782. Attorneys Sofia E. Biller and Howard S. Suskin examine the implications of that split on the availability of relief under �1782.
15 minute read
Westchester Day School v. Village of Mamaroneck, 06-1464-cv
Publication Date: 2007-10-22
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Cardamone
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 06-1464-cv

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT Joel C. Haims, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, New York (Jack C. Auspitz, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, New York; Stanley D.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT