0 results for 'Gordon & Rees'
Women Weigh In on Stanford Retaliation Case
The trial pitting former research scientist Colleen Crangle against Stanford University for allegedly retaliating against her after she complained about being treated as a "Girl Friday" began in federal court in San Jose, Calif. Several former Stanford faculty members, who also had filed complaints against the university, and members of the American Association of University Women, attended opening arguments and made their presence felt with intermittent heckles and groans of disapproval.The Score: Dewey's Football Bills, March Madness, and Opening Day
In our latest look at sports and the law, The Am Law Daily does some spring cleaning by tracking down the legal fees accrued by the National Football League Players Association in its collective bargaining battle with owners in 2011; catching up with one of the NCAA's top outside litigators from Schiff Hardin; and looking at the lawyers staying busy for Major League Baseball and the New York Yankees.San Francisco Office Sales Soar
How can law firms manage occupancy costs to protect profitability?Calif.'s Biggest Firms Receive Poor Marks for Minority Hiring
The grades are in on workforce diversity, and if this were school, the state's largest law firms would barely be passing.Cite as: Hollander v. Copacabana Nightclub, 08-5547-cv, NYLJ xxxxxx, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 1, 2010)Before: Pooler and Winter, Circuit Judges, Judge
Stanford Wants New Trial After Discrimination Verdict
Complaining that it was wrong for the judge to admit certain evidence into Colleen Crangle's retaliation trial, Stanford University has announced it will ask for a new trial. A federal jury of four men and four women found that Crangle was fired from the Stanford Medical School's Section of Medical Informatics because she had complained about sexual discrimination. Stanford complains that evidence of "pervasive discrimination" against women on the Stanford campus should not have been admitted at trial.Feds' Backdating Investigations Widen With Probes of More Tech Companies
Investor advocates, shareholders and regulators are upset about the growing number of companies embroiled in stock option backdating, which allows company executives to get rich because of options retroactively granted in time for steep increases in stock value. "The backdating of stock option grants is akin to picking lottery numbers on the day after the winning numbers are announced," says a shareholder lawsuit against Caremark Rx Inc., one of the companies being investigated.$75 Million Suit Claims Seyfarth Shaw Bungled Intellectual Property Case
Two inventors of snowboard bindings accuse their lawyers at Seyfarth Shaw and Burnett Burnett & Allen of doing a legal face plant that caused them to lose a patent infringement case.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now
Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now