Because the plaintiff's affidavit and deposition testimony were essentially consistent and other evidence supported his contention that the defendant failed to stop at a stop sign, the trial court e

The trial court did not err in dismissing the defendant's third-party claim for apportionment, as O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 abrogated such actions under the commo

The plaintiff was not an insured person for purposes of an underinsured motorist provision under her father's Tennessee automobile insurance policy, since she was not actually living at her parents'

The plaintiff failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing the request to poll the jurors after the ve

The defendant insurance company properly withdrew its coverage of the underlying automobile accident because the insured failed to cooperate in her de

The plaintiff was not entitled to stack the UM coverage provided in her boyfriend's four insurance pol

The plaintiff was not entitled to a default judgment because some of the defendants timely filed answers in federal before the case was remanded back to state