Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote'

You can use to get even better search results
October 25, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Attorney Tells Justices MCARE Statute of Repose Is Unconstitutional

The MCARE statute of repose violates the Pennsylvania Constitution's guarantee of open access to the courts, an attorney told the state Supreme Court on Wednesday.
4 minute read
October 23, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Justices Eye Exclusion of Risk, Complication Evidence in Med Mal Cases

Exclusion of defense evidence about the risks and complications of a procedure during a medical negligence trial would effectively impose strict liability on doctors, a defense attorney argued before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday.
3 minute read
U.S. ex rel. Daugherty v. Tiversa Holding Corp.
Publication Date: 2018-10-23
Practice Area: Government | White Collar Crime
Industry: Federal Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the relator: James W. Hawkins, James W. Hawkins, LLC, Alpharetta, Georgia
For defendant: For defendants Tiversa Holding Corp., Tiversa Inc., and Tiversa Government Inc.: Steven W. Zoffer, Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.; For defendant Robert Boback: Brandon J. Verdream, Robert J. Ridge, Jonathan D. Klein, Clark Hill PLC, New York, New York
Case number: 14 cv 4548

Only FCA Qui Tam Suit's Claims Based on DHS Contract Dismissed, Partly With Prejudice

September 19, 2018 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Clemens v. N. Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S legal expert analysis.  Clemensv.N. Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.United States Court of Appeals for the Third CircuitJune…
16 minute read
September 19, 2018 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

3d Circuit Decision a Warning to Insureds’ Attorneys About “Outrageously Excessive” Requests for Fees

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled that district courts may completely reject “outrageously excessive” requests for…
6 minute read
September 12, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

3rd Circ.: Judge Was Right to Award Nothing After 'Outrageously Excessive' $1M Fee Request

A federal appeals court has upheld the denial of a $1 million fee request by a Scranton attorney in an auto insurance case that produced a verdict almost a tenth of the requested legal compensation. In its denial, the Third Circuit, joining other circuit courts, also held that it is within a judge's discretion to award no attorney fees at all, especially if the fee request is deemed "outrageously excessive."
4 minute read
Via Port New York LLC v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Publication Date: 2018-09-10
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Real Estate | Retail
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, U.S. - NDNY
Judge: District Judge Glenn Suddaby
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: David M. Rubinstein, Esq., of Counsel, Ryan Law Partners LLP, Dallas, Texas
For defendant: Counsel for Defendant: Adam J. Ventura, Esq., Scott D. Clements, Esq., of Counsel, Dickie McCamey & Chilcote Law Firm, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Case number: 1:17-cv-1222

Sears Did Not Breach Lease Terms, Contract When Closing Mall Store in August 2016

September 05, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Retired US Chief Judge Stengel Joins Lancaster Law Firm

Stengel has been hired to lead Saxton & Stump's internal investigations practice and will work with clients in commercial, employment, intellectual property litigation and appeals.
2 minute read
August 24, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

As Big Law Steps on Their Turf, Midsized Firms Bet on Niche Practices

With increasing competition in the legal industry, and Big Law more often competing for the middle-market work midsize firms were built on, midsize firm leaders have been bullish about maintaining and expanding their specialized practices.
7 minute read
August 07, 2018 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Justices to Consider Application of Fair Share Act in Strict Liability Cases

The justices agreed to consider whether the state Superior Court last year misinterpreted the Fair Share Act by holding that judges should not simply divide the damages equally among all the defendants.
1 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

NEXT