0 results for 'Littler'
Federal Issue Not Substantial Enough for Removal
Where diversity jurisdiction is lacking, removal to federal court typically requires the removed case to assert a federal cause of action. An exception exists, however, where removal is proper if the state cause of action asserted involves a substantial federal issue.
As New Chair Takes Reins of Winston, He Wants to Do Things a Little Differently
Steve D'Amore has implemented a small management team that includes four other partners to handle areas such as talent, branding and overall strategy.
Big Law's Favorite (And Least Favorite) Cities
Data shows the world's largest law firms are disproportionately weighted towards just a few key markets, writes the Global Lawyer.
As Law Firms Embrace AI, Will Dedicated Executive Roles Give Them An Edge?
Firms are having to think about who should be tasked with the growth and implementation of generative AI at their firms, according to Carlos Pauling, executive director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's partner practice group.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
District of Columbia Legal Malpractice Law 2024
Authors: Shari L. Klevens, Alanna G. Clair
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Littler"
After Federal Judge's Dismissal, Zantac Legal Fight Reignites in State Courts
On May 23, the first verdict in the nation over Zantac came out in Illinois, while a Delaware judge's May 31 decision allowed plaintiffs' experts for thousands of cases.
Don't Let Your Trade Secrets Walk Out the Door With Your Employees: Patent Them!
The FTC's new rule makes it an unfair method of competition to enter into new noncompete clauses or enforce existing noncompete clauses after Sept. 4, 2024 (120 days after publication of the rule in the Federal Register), with very limited exceptions.
Divided Supreme Court Strikes Down Federal Bump Stock Ban
In its 6-3 decision, the high court rejected the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' argument that bump stocks are analogous to machine guns, which have been outlawed in the United States since the 1934.
Nonsignatory Held to Arbitration Pact in Dispute With Popular Water Ice Franchise
The court found there was no evidence that Rita's used litigation before seeking arbitration so as to cause a waiver. The mere fact that Rita's waited until there was a dispute to arbitrate did not constitute a waiver.
Trending Stories
- 1With a 7-Figure Book Deal and TV Adaptation on the Way, This Dechert Associate Remains Committed to Her Day Job
- 2Northwestern University Pritzker Law School Hit With Reverse Discrimination Lawsuit
- 3Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 4The Week in Data: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Settlement reached in lawsuit over death of clerk prior to $51 million jury award
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now