NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer'

You can use to get even better search results
June 21, 1999 | Law.com

Town Prosecutors Can't Do Criminal Defense in County

Part-time municipal prosecutors who defend criminal suspects in the same county have until July 1 to decide which part of their practice they want to keep. A three-judge Appellate Division panel delayed until then its ban on lawyers wearing both hats, while prosecutors seek state Supreme Court review of the case, State v. Clark, A-5661- 96T4. It applies only to cases in which a defense lawyer's appearance was entered on or after July 1.
9 minute read
October 26, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

Examining Psychological Injury In the Workplace

Some employees can recover lost wages after resigning from work due to a mental condition caused by the employer?s actions.
8 minute read
August 14, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach et al

A class-arbitration waiver in a consumer contract is unenforceable as being unconscionable; the public interest at stake in effectively pursing statutory rights under this State's consumer protection laws overrides the right to seek enforcement of the class-arbitration bar.
6 minute read
January 17, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

Corbo v. Elliot et al

Consistent with the goals of Best Practices, the track assignment in a case involving multiple causes of action that, if filed separately, would be assigned to different tracks with different presumptive discovery periods, should be based on the predominant or fundamental causes of action in the case; here, where the predominant claims sound in tort, the case is assigned to Track II.
11 minute read
June 28, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

Trinity Church v. Atkin Olshin Lawson-Bell et al

Plaintiff's complaint alleging construction defects was properly dismissed because it was filed beyond the statute of limitations which, by contract, ran from the date of substantial completion, and because plaintiff failed to provide evidence of inequitable conduct by defendants.
5 minute read
September 13, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

New York Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation v. Jackson

The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act does not pre-empt state regulation if it is nondiscriminatory and not unreasonably burdensome.
5 minute read
May 30, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

Cumberland Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Murphy et al

An equally divided Court affirms the Appellate Division decision that the exclusionary clauses in this homeowner's insurance policy, for "willful harm" or "knowing endangerment" and "knowing violation of penal law," do not exclude coverage for the injuries that resulted when the insureds' teenage son, while intentionally firing a BB gun at passing cars, struck a driver, blinding her in one eye, since the circumstances did not support a presumption that he harbored a subjective intent to injure anyone.
19 minute read
June 23, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation v. Chinery, etc., et al,

Bankruptcy courts may authorize creditors' committees to sue derivatively to avoid fraudulent transfers for the benefit of the estate; Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, a Chapter 7 case that interpreted the text of 11 U.S.C. � 506(c) to foreclose anyone other than a trustee from seeking to recover administrative costs on its own behalf, does not operate to prevent the Bankruptcy Court from authorizing such suits; the judgment of the District Court is reversed.
10 minute read
March 12, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Inadmissible

Short takes on lawyers, firms and judges.
5 minute read
September 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation,

A creditors' committee may not assert fraudulent-transfer claims under 11 U.S.C. � 544 of the Bankruptcy Code; the plain language of � 544 and Hartford Underwriters, holding that an administrative claimant of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate does not have an independent right to bring suit under 11 U.S.C. � 506(c), allow only the trustee or debtor-in-possession to assert fraudulent-transfer claims, and a creditor or creditors' committee may not bring such avoidance actions derivatively; the dismissal
9 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Driving Value with Better Decision-Making: A Governance Maturity Checklist

    Brought to you by Diligent Corporation

    Download Now

  • Strategic Triumph: Unveiling the Secrets Behind Small Law Firms Thriving with AI Research and Drafting

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now