Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher'

You can use to get even better search results
December 15, 2009 |

Hogan and Lovells partners approve merger

Partners at Hogan & Hartson and Lovells signed off on their megamerger in separate votes that ended at midnight on Monday. The move is one of the last big hurdles before the two firms officially set up shop, which is planned for May 1.
5 minute read
Lead Paint Makers Hope to Carry on Winning Streak
Publication Date: 2013-07-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A bench trial begins on Monday in San Jose in a suit that accuses five major corporations of creating a public nuisance by manufacturing and promoting lead-based paint despite knowledge it was harmful. Ten cities and counties in California are demanding nearly $1 billion in cleanup costs.

Making Sense of the Madness: A Gulf Oil Spill Litigation Primer
Publication Date: 2010-06-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

We answer three key questions: Who's representing whom? What's going on with judicial recusals? And are cases moving in advance of the MDL panel's July meeting?

Matter of OxyContin II, 700000/07
Publication Date: 2010-09-27
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
Judge: Before: Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Roman, Sgroi, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, N.Y. (Donald I. Strauber, Mary T. Yelenick, Phoebe A. Wilkinson, and Alexandra A. Nellos of counsel), and Harold Siegel, Staten Island, N.Y., for appellants (one brief filed).
For defendant: Sanders Viener Grossman, LLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Douglas H. Sanders, Melissa C. Ingrassia, Aybike Donuk, and Michael Ihrig of counsel), for respondents.
Case number: 700000/07

Cite as: Matter of OxyContin II, 700000/07, NYLJ 1202472518491, at *1 (App. Div. 2nd, Decided September 21, 2010)Before: Prudenti, P.J., Fisher, Roman, Sgroi, J

September 21, 2007 |

U.S. Firms in London Say They're More Merger-Minded

Legal Week's annual survey of U.S. firms in London reveals that 47 percent of respondents would consider a merger with a U.K. firm, up from 39 percent last year and just 29 percent in 2005. The trend may signal that firms realize how hard it is to grow organically in the London legal market, which by some measures is now the most costly in which to operate worldwide. Putting additional pressure on U.S. firms: the weak dollar and the related disadvantage in attracting heavy-hitting London partners.
11 minute read
E. Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
Publication Date: 2010-07-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The phrase "bet-the-company case" gets thrown around a lot. But when Rosenkranz took over MGA's appeal of a sweeping injunction that turned over its billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise to Mattel, he truly did save his client from corporate extinction.

Sears v. Catholic Archdiocese of Washington
Publication Date: 2010-10-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: D.C. Ct. App.
Judge: Ruiz, Associate Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: Nos. 06-CV-1469 & 07-CV-23

Argued March 26, 2008Before RUIZ, and BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judges, and JOSEY-HERRING, Associate Judge, Superior Court of the District of Columbia.*fn1Ap

Allergan Agrees to Pay $600 Million to Resolve DOJ Botox Off-Label Marketing Investigation; Will Drop First Amendment Suit Against FDA; Whistleblowers to Split $38 Million
Publication Date: 2010-09-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

However fervently the pharma company believes in the wonders of Botox, the Justice Department still holds all the cards when it comes to off-label marketing.

Laurence H. Rabe v. United Airlines, Inc
Publication Date: 2011-03-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 7th Cir.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-3300

SUBMITTED MAY 5, 2010"Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and COFFEY andHAMILTON, Circuit Judges.HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.This case presents issues concerning the application of United Stat

Mullin v. Washington Free Weekly, Inc.
Publication Date: 2001-11-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: D.C. Ct. App.
Judge: Steadman, Associate Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 00-CV-1199

Argued September 13, 2001Allegedly defamatory remarks concerning appellant Joseph Mullin appeared in an article in Washington City Paper (City Paper), published by appellee Washington Free Weekly,

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

NEXT