NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Stroock'

You can use to get even better search results
March 12, 2010 | Law.com

Darby & Darby Decides to Dissolve

Darby & Darby, a century-old New York intellectual property boutique, said Friday that it would begin the process of dissolving. The decision follows a series of departures, as partners left to join general practice firms including McDermott Will & Emery and Stroock & Stroock & Lavan. Darby & Darby made the decision to dissolve after it was unable to work out a merger, according to the firm's spokeswoman, Beth Silberstein.
2 minute read
April 25, 2012 | National Law Journal

Thwarted Hollywood dealmaker targets the lawyers

A $100 million lawsuit filed on April 20 against Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and Levene Neale Bender Yoo & Brill isn't the first time that film financier David Bergstein has leveled accusations of professional malpractice against his former attorneys.
5 minute read
January 31, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Personal Notes on Lawyers

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitman has added two finance partners from Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and other New York moves.
2 minute read
March 06, 2000 | Law.com

Stroock Standing Trial for Firing Associate

The Los Angeles office of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan must stand trial on allegations of fraud and breach of contract brought by an ex-associate who says she was fired for revealing fraudulent billing, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled.
3 minute read
Bergstein Lawyer Says $50 Million Verdict Is 'Tremendous' News for Film Financier's Case Against Stroock
Publication Date: 2012-08-22
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A Los Angeles jury handed film financier David Bergstein a big win this week in his case against attorney Susan Tregub. And according to one of Bergstein's lawyers, the verdict is also very good news for his separate suit against Stroock & Stroock & Lavan and others.

October 01, 2010 | New York Law Journal

Condo Buyers Win Court Round in Bid to Exploit Firm Typo

Condominium buyers who seized on what has been described as a typo in offering documents by a Stroock & Stroock & Lavan lawyer yesterday won a round in the fight to recoup their deposits. But the litigation is not over, despite the decision by the Second Circuit, which upheld a lower court's refusal to grant an injunction that would have blocked the release of some $16 million in buyer deposits from an escrow account maintained by the project developer.
4 minute read
December 03, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Corrections

1 minute read
January 25, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Condo Developer Is Directed to Return $16 Million to Buyers

Acting Supreme Court Justice Anil C. Singh rejected arguments by developers of a luxury Upper West Side condo that the offering plan drawn up by a Stroock & Stroock & Lavan attorney mistakenly included a Sept. 1, 2008, rescission date when it should have been Sept. 1, 2009.
5 minute read
March 20, 2009 | New York Law Journal

NY Partners On the Move

1 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Retention & Online Reputation for Law Firms: 2025 Guide

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • Europe's Escalating Regulatory Framework: Mapping Efforts to Mitigate Supply Chain Risks

    Brought to you by LRN

    Download Now