NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer'

You can use to get even better search results
June 28, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

Trinity Church v. Atkin Olshin Lawson-Bell et al

Plaintiff's complaint alleging construction defects was properly dismissed because it was filed beyond the statute of limitations which, by contract, ran from the date of substantial completion, and because plaintiff failed to provide evidence of inequitable conduct by defendants.
5 minute read
September 13, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

New York Susquehanna and Western Railway Corporation v. Jackson

The Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act does not pre-empt state regulation if it is nondiscriminatory and not unreasonably burdensome.
5 minute read
May 30, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

Cumberland Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Murphy et al

An equally divided Court affirms the Appellate Division decision that the exclusionary clauses in this homeowner's insurance policy, for "willful harm" or "knowing endangerment" and "knowing violation of penal law," do not exclude coverage for the injuries that resulted when the insureds' teenage son, while intentionally firing a BB gun at passing cars, struck a driver, blinding her in one eye, since the circumstances did not support a presumption that he harbored a subjective intent to injure anyone.
19 minute read
June 23, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation v. Chinery, etc., et al,

Bankruptcy courts may authorize creditors' committees to sue derivatively to avoid fraudulent transfers for the benefit of the estate; Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, a Chapter 7 case that interpreted the text of 11 U.S.C. � 506(c) to foreclose anyone other than a trustee from seeking to recover administrative costs on its own behalf, does not operate to prevent the Bankruptcy Court from authorizing such suits; the judgment of the District Court is reversed.
10 minute read
March 12, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Inadmissible

Short takes on lawyers, firms and judges.
5 minute read
September 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation,

A creditors' committee may not assert fraudulent-transfer claims under 11 U.S.C. � 544 of the Bankruptcy Code; the plain language of � 544 and Hartford Underwriters, holding that an administrative claimant of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate does not have an independent right to bring suit under 11 U.S.C. � 506(c), allow only the trustee or debtor-in-possession to assert fraudulent-transfer claims, and a creditor or creditors' committee may not bring such avoidance actions derivatively; the dismissal
9 minute read
Israel Discount Bank of New York v. NCC Sportswear Corp., 603912/06
Publication Date: 2008-03-24
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Bernard Fried
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 603912/06

Justice Bernard J. Fried NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Appearances: By: Kenneth R. Schachter, Esq. Silverberg Stonehill Goldsmith & Ha

April 05, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

Hardwicke v. American Boychoir School et al, etc.,

In these consolidated appeals, where plaintiffs allege that they were the victims of sexual abuse by employees of defendant, a private, non-profit school, while they were boarding students there, the trial court erred in dismissing their claims against the school under the Child Sexual Abuse Act (CSAA) since, notwithstanding its status as a corporate entity, there is no impediment to including the school ? which operated in an in loco parentis capacity with respect to its students and as a "household" wi
30 minute read
April 23, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Calendar

Calendar of events.
8 minute read
January 31, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

DKM Residential Properties Corp. v. Township of Montgomery et al.

The Uniform Construction Code Act permits a municipal construction official to cite a developer for a construction code violation regarding property that has been conveyed and for which a certificate of occupancy has issued; that authority encompasses, at the very least, violations that would have supported the withholding of the certificate of occupancy in the first instance had they been known.
10 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 5 Proven Steps to Accelerate Business Growth in a Crowded Legal Market

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2024 Report: Digital Payments in Class Actions and Mass Torts + a Special Look at Industry Fraud

    Brought to you by Western Alliance Bank, Member FDIC.

    Download Now

  • Law Firm Office Space Perspective: Major U.S. Markets

    Brought to you by JLL

    Download Now

  • Expanding Your Practice Areas: How to Expand Offerings that Attract and Retain Clients

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now