Search Results

0 results for 'Parker Waichman LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Parker Waichman v Napoli
Publication Date: 2006-05-18
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

By Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny, Catterson, JJ. 6893-6894N. Parker & Waichman, plf-res, v. Paul J. Napoli def-ap [And a Third-Party Action] ____

Sullivan v. Our Lady of Consolation Geriatric Care Center, 15938/04
Publication Date: 2006-12-21
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
Judge: Howard Berler
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 15938/04

SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court PLAINTIFF'S ATTY: Parker & Waichman, LLP by Allan M. Silverstein, DEFENDANT'S ATTY: Kral, Clerkin, Redm

Concille v. Weingarten, 104798/2007
Publication Date: 2010-01-13
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Richmond County
Judge: Judith McMahon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 104798/2007

Justice Judith N. McMahon RICHMOND COUNTY Supreme Court The attorneys for plaintiffs are Parker Waichman Alonso, LLP Attorneys for defendants/third party plaintif

July 14, 2010 |

News In Brief

5 minute read
Matter of New York Diet Drug Litig.
Publication Date: 2008-01-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 2184N

Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Catterson, Kavanagh, JJ. 2184N Index 700000/98 115937/99 In Re: New York Diet Drug Litigation Clara Appel-Hole, et al., Plaintiffs, v

Sime v Ludhar
Publication Date: 2007-02-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

CRANE, J.P., SANTUCCI, DILLON and BALKIN, JJ. Tani Sime, appellant, v Sudhvinder Ludhar, et al., respondents. (Index No. 11161/05) Parker & Waichman, LLP

July 31, 2013 |

Parker Waichman LLP v. Gilman Law

Trade Dress Infringement Over Copy of Site's 'Look and Feel' Held Inadequately Asserted
1 minute read
September 21, 2012 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
380 minute read

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT