0 results for 'Goldberg Segalla'
Attorney's Fees McDaniel v. County of Schenectady, 07-5580-cv U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston Decided: Feb. 16, 2010 ELMER ROBERT KEACH, III, Law Office of Elmer Rober
Publication Date: 2010-02-18 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Unknown Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: No CaseNumber
Attorney's Fees McDaniel v. County of Schenectady, 07-5580-cv U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston Decided: Feb. 16, 2010 Before:
Williams v New York City Tr. Auth.
Publication Date: 2008-12-30 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 2007-05119
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. ROBERT A. LIFSON RANDALL T. ENG CHERYL E.
C-KITCHEN ASSOCIATES, INC., v THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES
Publication Date: 2005-02-04 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 151
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 151 CA 04-01305 PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUT
RACZKA, STEVEN v RAMIREZ, DAVID F.
Publication Date: 2010-02-11 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 1623
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1623 CA 09-00107 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FA
BAX, LEO L. v COLT BLOCK ASSOCIATION
Publication Date: 2006-02-03 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 1541
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1541 CA 05-00976 PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBU
Class Certification Denied in Fraud Suit Over Marketing of Relacore
A suit alleging that the maker of the dietary supplement Relacore fraudulently marketed it for use in cutting belly fat and stress is not right for class action treatment, a New Jersey appeals court ruled on Friday. The judges said there are too many possible variables to satisfy the requirement that questions of law or fact common to the class predominate over questions affecting only individual members.
Nick's Brick Oven Pizza, Inc. v Excelsior Ins. Co.
Publication Date: 2009-04-07 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 2008-03856
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department PETER B. SKELOS, J.P. MARK C. DILLON JOHN M. LEVENTHAL CHERYL E. CH
Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Joshua Wright Sues GMU for Alleged Title IX Violations, but Has $108M Defamation Suit Against Accusers Tossed
- 3In Wake of Sexual Misconduct Allegations Against Ex-Law Professor, GMU Bans Intimate Relationships With Students
- 4Law.com's Top 100 Verdicts of 2023
- 5Updated Stanford Report Finds High Hallucination Rates on Westlaw AI
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now