Argued April 30, 2001The core issues presented on this appeal are rather straightforward: in the face of a concededly excessive damages award, when is the remedy of a new damages trial conditioned

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J. REINALDO E. RIVERA FRED T. SANTUCCI HOWARD M

MARCIA BETH PAUL, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiffs-Appellees. EDWARD H. ROSENTHAL (Maura J. Wogan, Jessie F. Beeber, Cameron A. Myler, Marisa Sarig, on the brief),

ORDERS ON CAUSESFrom Harris County; 1st district (01-07-00274-CV, 274 SW3d 179, 10-02-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. Justice O'Neil

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Before: MOORE and COOK, Circuit Judges; LUDINGTON, District Judge.*fn1COOK, J., delivere

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. O P I N I O N GERBER, Judge After appellants promoted an unsuccessful bill in the Arizona L

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. RYMER, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether �#167; 621(a)(2) of the Cable Communications Pol

U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit Decided Dec. 18, 2003 Before Pooler, B.D., Parker and Wesley, C.JJ. Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense, and Jose P