An attorney, who was sued for violating wiretap statutes by her client's adversary, failed to convince the supreme court that she was entitled to complete relief.

Health Choice Advisory brought a qui tam action under the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act against Shire alleging it violated anti-kickback provisions of the Act by implementing two marketing programs that incentivized medical providers to prescribe certain pharmaceutical products covered by the Texas Medicaid Program.

This case called on the court to define more precisely the scope of the attorney-immunity defense.

The parties were involved in the renovation and reconstruction of the historic Statler Hotel and downtown public library in Dallas, Texas, and the project's funding included TIF funds of $46 million.

Appellee poured water on appellant's head while appellant addressed the media and others during a press conference.

Petitioner's husband died in a car accident while towing a trailer.

Nearly eleven years after a corporate officer incurred personal liability for transferring corporate assets in violation of a federal statute, he sued the lawyer who purportedly "blessed" the transactions without warning him about the collateral consequences.

Appellant sued appellee, his attorney, for legal malpractice asserting a failure to file an appeal of an award granted to the United States against appellants company, Renda Marine, Inc., in relation to a contract to dredge the Houston-Galveston shipping canal.