The trial court erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiff in her suit to collect uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits following an automobile accident, because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding coverage under five automobile insurance policies issued to plaintiff's father.

The trial court properly granted insurers' motions for summary judgment in plaintiffs' suit seeking uninsured motorist coverage because plaintiffs failed to timely notify insurers of the underlying car accident as required by provisions in the insurance policies.

There was no evidentiary support for the jury verdict in favor of the defendant, as he admitted liability and the only issue in the first phase of the trial was the plaintiffs' claim for da

No expert medical evidence in the record established that the defendant orthopedic surgeon violated the applicable standard of care in conducting the plaintiff's hip replacement su

Because the plaintiff was not aboard or in the act of boarding or exiting the defendant's trolley when she fell, no carrier-passenger relationship existed so as to invoke the duty of extraordinary c