0 results for 'Montgomery & Andrews, P.A.'
Appellate Division, First Department:December 8, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-12-10 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department:December 8, 2020
On Opening Day, Ginsburg Is Honored and Two Justices Renew Attack on Same-Sex Marriage
The ACLU's James Esseks, director of the LGBT and HIV project, said in a statement: "It is appalling that five years after the historic decision in Obergefell, two justices still consider same-sex couples less worthy of marriage than other couples."
Sprint Commc'ns Co. LP v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-01-08 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Andrews Attorneys: For plaintiff: R. Montgomery Donaldson and Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; B. Trent Webb, Aaron E. Hankel, Ryan J. Schletzbaum, Ryan D. Dykal, Jordan T. Bergsten, Lauren E. Douville, Mark D. Schafer, Maxwell C. McGraw, Samuel J. LaRoque, Robert H. Reckers and Michael W. Gray, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO and Houston, TX for Sprint Communications. For defendant: Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David S. Benyacar, Daniel L. Reisner and Robert J. Ka-terberg, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY and Washington, DC; Gregory Arovas, Jeanne M. Heffernan, James E. Marina, Luke L. Dauchot and Bao Nguyen, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, Los Angeles, CA and San Francisco, CA for Charter Communications. Steven J. Balick and Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Robinson Vu, Lindsay Volpenhein Cutié, Amy E. Bergeron and Timothy S. Durst, Baker Botts LLP, Houston, TX and Dallas, TX for Media-com Communications, WideOpenWest Networks, Atlantic Broadband Fin. and Grande Communications Networks. Phillip A. Rovner, Jonathan A. Choa and Alan R. Silverstein, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian M. Buroker, Omar F. Amin, Jessica Altman and Robert Vincent, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC and Dallas, TX for Frontier Com-munications. Case number: D68836
The court construed patent terms relating to technology for making telephone calls over the internet.
TC Tech. LLC v. Sprint Corp.
Publication Date: 2019-11-27 Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware Judge: District Judge Andrews Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kelly E. Farnan and Katharine L. Mowery, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Lawrence J. Gotts, Kevin L. Mallen and Gabriel S. Gross, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, New York, NY and Menlo Park CA; Stephanie N. Solomon, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY; David S. Benyacar, Daniel L. Reisner, Maxwell C. Preston and Michael J. Block, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff. For defendant: R. Montgomery Donaldson and Christina B. Vavala, Polsinelli PC, Wilmington, DE; B. Trent Webb, Christine A. Guastello, Jordan T. Bergsten, Colman D. McCarthy, David Morehan and Gary M. Miller, Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, Kansas City, MO, Houston, TX and Chicago, IL for defendants. Case number: D68788
In the claim construction for this patent case involving wireless services, the court relied on the plain meaning of the term and the context of the claim language.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Montgomery County Court Rules 2024
Authors:
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Montgomery & Andrews, P.A."
Appellate Division, First Department: May 15, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-05-16 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, First Department: May 15, 2018
Van Der Fluit v. Yates
Publication Date: 2017-12-13 Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Software |
Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Stuart A. Davidson and Christopher Martins, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, FL; David T. Wissbroecker and Edward Gergosian, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, CA, attorneys for plaintiff For defendant: Thomas A. Beck, Blake Rohrbacher, and Susan M. Hannigan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendants. Case number: D67968
Although proxy failed to disclose identity of selling companys key negotiators, stockholders challenge to tender offer and merger transaction dismissed for failure to plead non-exculpated claims against co-founders and directors, where there was no evidence that majority of board and tendering stockholders were interested or non-independent.
Leonis v. Lawal
Publication Date: 2017-11-22 Practice Area: Civil Procedure |
Corporate Governance
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Vice Chancellor Montgomery-Reeves Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stuart M. Grant and Michael J. Barry, Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Peter B. Andrews and Craig J. Springer, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jeremy Friedman, Spencer Oster, and David Tejtel, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, New York, NY, attorneys for plaintiff For defendant: Myron T. Steele, Arthur L. Dent, and Jaclyn C. Levy, Potter Andersoon & Corroon LLP; David T. Moran and Christopher R. Bankler, Jackson Walker LLP, Dallas, TX; Gregroy V. Varallo, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; J. Wiley George, Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston, TX; David J. Teklits and Kevin M. Coen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark Oakes and Ryan Meltzer, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Austin, TX; John Byron, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Houston, TX, attorneys for defendants. Case number: D67944
Derivative complaint dismissed where board protected by exculpatory provision in bylaws, and plaintiff failed to make demand, and further failed to plead likelihood of liability for non-exculpated claims as to majority of board members to establish challenged transaction as invalid exercise of business judgment.
Chancery Court Tosses Derivative Challenge to African Oil Transaction
The Delaware Court of Chancery on Tuesday dismissed a derivative suit filed on behalf of Erin Energy Corp., saying the company's board had successfully pushed back against alleged attempts by its controller to play all sides of a three-way transaction to acquire oil mining rights in Africa.
United Nuclear Corp. v. Allendale Mut. Ins. Co.
Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis United Nuclear Corp. v. Allendale Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New MexicoOctober 15, 1985Nos.…Trending Stories
- 1Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 2AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 3Few Big Law Firms With Single-Tier Partnerships Are Left. They Aren't Talking About It.
- 4Kirkland Merges Finance Practices Ahead of New Star Hire, as Private Credit Market Booms
- 5Where Do Law Grads Get the Most Bang for Their Buck?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now