Court affirms dismissal of homeowners' complaint against a homeowners' association because their lawsuit should have been filed as a derivative claim and not as direct claims by the homeowners

Court affirms judgment of actual and punitive damages and attorneys' fees in favor of a plaintiff that sued for wrongful injunction and abusive litigation

Court affirms and partially reverses decisions involving insurance insolvency pool reimbursement claims and remands for review of constitutional due process issues

Court affirms convictions for malice murder and other crimes relating to the death of a three-year old disabled child

Appellant appealed the trial court's judgment of sentence entered on his jury conviction for driving under the influence in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3802(d(1)(i) and (iii). The court affirmed, holding that the challenged statutory sections did not violate appellant's constitutional rights to equal protection, substantive due process, or procedural due process as a user of medical marijuana.

Court vacates ruling affirming a UGA student's suspension and nullifying UGA Conduct Regulations, and remands matter with direction to reconsider student's self-defense claims

The court sustained defendant's preliminary objection to plaintiff's amended complaint pursuant to Pa. R. Civ. P. 1028(a)(6) due to an arbitration clause in the lease agreement between defendant and plaintiff's insured. The court said it lacked jurisdiction over other claims due to the binding arbitration agreement.

University could terminate police officer for discriminatory social media posts under long-standing public policy prohibiting discrimination and department policy requiring officers to exercise their duties with respect for others' rights. Petition for review granted.

Trial court correctly dismissed protection from abuse petition based on evidence of alleged child abuse that had been litigated in a prior PFA petition and deemed unfounded by the court and law enforcement/child protection agencies. Order of the trial court affirmed.

Court dismissed officer's constitutional claims arising from prosecutors' disclosure of the officer's Internal Affairs Division file where prosecutors acted under good faith interpretation of their Brady obligations to disclose impeachment evidence for prosecution witnesses. Order of the district court affirmed.