NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Lieff Cabraser'

You can use to get even better search results
Huitt v. Southern California Gas Company
Publication Date: 2010-10-07
Practice Area: personal injury
Industry:
Court: C.A. 5th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Fitzgerald, Lundberg & Romig, Ken M. Fitzgerald, Barbrae Lundberg; Dowling, Aaron & Keeler, Lynne Thaxter Brown and Richard M. Aaron for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
For defendant: Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad, John A. Taylor, Jr., Daniel J. Gonzalez; Jamiel G. Dave; Peel, Garcia & Stamper and James W. Peel for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. F056892

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13003 MICHAEL SEAN HUITT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COM

February 19, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

Fen-Phenomenal Plaintiffs` Lawyers Seek Million Fee in Diet Drug Case

Plaintiffs` Lawyers Seek Million Fee in Diet Drug CaseIf the lead plaintiffs` lawyers in the Fen-Phen diet drug litigation get their way, the headlines a few months from now will announce that a federal judge has awarded them million in fees for the work that led to a settlement they now say is worth .75 billion to billion.
6 minute read
June 20, 2005 | Law.com

Integrity Agreements Could Spark Litigation

In 2003, medical device maker Guidant Corp. pledged to comply with a tough corporate integrity agreement after it admitted covering up thousands of cases in which its aortic stent malfunctioned. Less than two years later, Guidant was accused of failing to report an electrical flaw in an implantable defibrillator. The case may open a wedge for plaintiffs attorneys to seek punitive damages if a company becomes a repeat offender in violation of its integrity agreement.
4 minute read
Cornell v. Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A., 97 Civ. 2262
Publication Date: 2009-03-31
Practice Area: Attorneys Fees
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Andrew Peck
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 97 Civ. 2262

Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Magistrate Judge Peck OPINION AND ORDER Presently before the C

August 04, 2005 | Law.com

Silica Case Seen as Breakthrough

Lawyers who defend mass torts hope to build on momentum they picked up since federal Judge Janis Graham Jack confirmed their belief that something is rotten in the state of medical screening in these cases. The case involved a large inventory of claims that gave the defendants the opportunity -- for the first time -- to analyze broader patterns, enabling them to demonstrate to the court widespread abuse in mass-screened silica claims.
6 minute read
In re Assicuriazioni Generali S.p.A., 05-5612-cv; 05-5310-cv
Publication Date: 2010-01-26
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No CaseNumber

Before: Leval, Calabresi, and Pooler, C.JJ. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT William M. Shernoff, Shernoff Bidart & Darras, Claremont, California (Nancy Sher Coh

Ketchum v. Moses
Publication Date: 2001-02-27
Practice Area: attorneys' fees | civil practice : state
Industry:
Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
Judge: Mosk, J., GEORGE, C. J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., BROWN, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Marshall W. Krause and Lawrence A. Baskin
For defendant: Bill Lockyer, et al.
Case number: No. S077350

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Defendant sought mandatory attorney fees after he moved to strike allegations in a so-called stratetgic lawsuit aga

Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. Gore
Publication Date: 2010-05-17
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Appellant: Shartsis Friese, Arthur J. Shartsis, Erick C. Howard; Eisenberg and Hancock, Jon B. Eisenberg and William N. Hancock for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Attorneys for Respondent: Davis Wright Tremaine, Thomas R. Burke and Rochelle L. Wilcox for Defendants and Respondents. Arkin & Glovsky and Sharon Arkin for Consumer Attorneys of California as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Levy, Ram & Olson and Karl Olson for Senator Sheila Kuehl and California First Amendment Coalition as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
Case number: No. S164174

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 5946SIMPSON STRONG-TIE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v.PIERCE GORE et al.,

June 08, 1999 | Law.com

Share and Share Alike

William Lerach and his brethren in the plaintiffs securities bar have long complained about the way public companies are run. They go so far as to charge that financial fraud and chicanery are rampant on Wall Street and in Silicon Valley. That's why it's a little bit funny that these lawyers are heavily invested in the very companies they have sued. Increasingly, instead of taking cash for their fees, class action lawyers are accepting stock as payment.
6 minute read
October 24, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys, In-House Counsel and Multijurisdictional Practitioners

Notice to the bar.
116 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 5 Proven Steps to Accelerate Business Growth in a Crowded Legal Market

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2024 Report: Digital Payments in Class Actions and Mass Torts + a Special Look at Industry Fraud

    Brought to you by Western Alliance Bank, Member FDIC.

    Download Now

  • Law Firm Office Space Perspective: Major U.S. Markets

    Brought to you by JLL

    Download Now

  • Expanding Your Practice Areas: How to Expand Offerings that Attract and Retain Clients

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now