0 results for ''Bayard''
Appellate Division, Second Department: June 19, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-06-21 Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity |
Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: DOCKET
Appellate Division, Second Department: June 19, 2018
Bayard Counsel Helped to Plan ABI Spring Meeting
Bayard P.A.'s Evan T. Miller, in his capacity as education director for the American Bankruptcy Institute's Young & New Members Committee, helped plan a panel discussion at the 36th annual ABI 2018 spring meeting in Washington, D.C. last month.
Bayard Director Serves On Energy Industry Panel
Scott D. Cousins, a director in Bayard PA's business restructuring and liquidations group, served as a panelist on a topic titled "Power Industry: What's Next?" at the American Bankruptcy Institute's 36th annual spring meeting on in Washington, DC.
Microsoft Moves for Dismissal in Suit Over Siri Digital Assistant Patents
Microsoft Corp. is asking a Delaware federal judge to dismiss an infringement suit targeting the Redmond, Washington-based tech giant's Cortana digital assistant products, seizing on an earlier ruling that invalidated three patents at the heart of the case.
Bayard Brings on New Associate in Bankruptcy Group
Bayard P.A. added Daniel N. Brogan as an associate in its corporate bankruptcy and restructuring group.
Del. Federal Judge Invalidates 3 Siri Digital Assistant Patents
A Delaware federal judge has invalidated three patents at the center of a series of lawsuits accusing major companies of infringing upon the technology that underpins Siri, the digital assistant built into Apple products.
Appellate Division Second Department Motion List released on: March 15, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-03-19 Practice Area: Civil Appeals |
Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department Judge: Unsigned Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: Docket
Appellate DivisionSecond Department
Appel v. Berkman
Publication Date: 2018-03-07 Practice Area: Corporate Governance |
Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Delaware Supreme Court Judge: Justice Strine Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeremy Friedman, Spencer Oster, and David Tejtel, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, New York, NY; Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer, and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for appellant For defendant: Mark A. Kirsch and Jefferson E. Bell, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Brian M. Lutz, Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA; Raymond J. DiCamillo and Elizabeth DeFelice, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Stephen B. Brauerman and Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE, attorneys for appellees. Case number: D68063
Boards decision to exclude the chairman/founders opposition to a proposed merger transaction from the stockholders proxy statement was in error, where the facts of such opposition may have been material to a stockholders decision to approve the transaction and the omission of such facts rendered the proxy a partial, incomplete disclosure.
In re: TransPerfect Global, Inc.
Publication Date: 2018-02-28 Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry:
Court: Court of Chancery Judge: Chancellor Bouchard Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin R. Shannon, Berton W. Ashman, Jr., Christopher N. Kelly, Jaclyn C. Levy, and Mathew A. Golden, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Philip S. Kaufman, Ronald S. Greenberg, Marjorie E. Sheldon, and Jared I. Heller, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, attorneys for petitioner For defendant: David L. Finger, Finger & Slanina LLC, Wilmington, DE; Peter B. Ladig and Brett M. McCartney, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; David B. Goldstein, Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P.C., New York, NY; Jeremy D. Eicher, Eicher Law LLC, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for respondents. Case number: D68056
Sale of petitioners interest in company to co-founder and opposing party approved, where custodian conducting sale enjoyed independence due to indemnification and advancement rights, and where petitioners objections to sale apparently motivated by animus toward opposing party.
Trending Stories
- 1Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 2AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 3Few Big Law Firms With Single-Tier Partnerships Are Left. They Aren't Talking About It.
- 4Kirkland Merges Finance Practices Ahead of New Star Hire, as Private Credit Market Booms
- 5Where Do Law Grads Get the Most Bang for Their Buck?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now