Search Results

0 results for 'Clausen Miller'

You can use to get even better search results
November 13, 2006 |

The NLJ 250 Chart (201-250)

6 minute read
Park Electrochemical Corp. and Neltec, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Continental Casualty Company, Defendant, 04-CV-4916 (ENV) (ARL)
Publication Date: 2011-02-25
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Eric N. Vitaliano
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Richard P. Lewis, Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C., New York. For Defendant: James R. Swinehart, Clausen Miller, P.C., Chicago.
For defendant: *1
Case number: 04-CV-4916 (ENV) (ARL)

Cite as: Park Electrochemical Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 04-CV-4916 (ENV) (ARL), NYLJ 1202483184270, at *1 (EDNY, Decided February 16, 2011)District Jud

ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, v ZWICK, ANDREW
Publication Date: 2006-03-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 169

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 169 CA 05-01490 PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., SCUDDER, K

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v Commonwealth Insurance Company
Publication Date: 2005-06-16
Practice Area: Civil Practice | International Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

By Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 6345. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, plf-ap, v. Commonwealth Insurance Company, def-res _______________

November 13, 2007 |

Successful Bar Candidates, July 2007

Listed below are the names of successful candidates from the July 2006 New Jersey Bar Examination. Of the 3,050 candidates who sat for this examination, 2,949 have been mailed their results. The balance will receive their results after correcting deficiencies in their applications. Of the applicants notified, 2,347 (or 79.5 percent) passed.
24 minute read
August 25, 2003 |

Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company v. Terk Technologies Corp.

Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Trademark Suit; Defendant's Actions Fell Within Policy Exclusion
19 minute read
October 10, 2008 |

Associates Class of 2008

Our ninth annual magazine devoted to new associates at New Jersey law firms.
79 minute read
L L DEVELOPERS OF GREATER ROCHESTER, v NYNA ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Publication Date: 2008-06-06
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 743

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 743 CA 07-02606 PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., LUNN, FAHE

VALVO, ANTHONY v LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE 1614
Publication Date: 2006-09-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1001

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1001 CA 06-00106 PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., GORSKI, M

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT