NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Thornton Law Firm LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Ellis v. Grant Thornton LLP
Publication Date: 2008-07-02
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: 4th Cir.
Judge: Hamilton, Senior Circuit Judge
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For appellant: Stanley Parzen, Mayer Brown, Chicago.
For defendant: For appellee: Benjamin Bailey, Bailey & Glasser, Charleston, W.Va.
Case number: 07-1352

PUBLISHEDArgued: March 19, 2008Before DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and William L. OSTEEN, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, s

September 24, 2010 |

2010 Ineligible List

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
387 minute read
September 20, 2007 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
400 minute read
September 26, 2005 |

2005 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
407 minute read
March 01, 2004 |

Accounting Firms' GCs Return To Roost

Hey come. They go. They come back again. The doors to the general counsel's office have been spinning at two of the country's largest accounting firms. Grant Thornton LLP brought Margaret Maxwell Zagel back to serve as its legal chief, five years after she left the same job to join the high-tech circus. And BDO Seidman, LLP, rehired Scott Univer a mere five months after he left for private practice. Zagel and Univer are returning to an industry reeling from auditing scandals and the tough regulatory climate
4 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Maximizing Law Firm Profitability: Hiring, Training and Developing Productive Lawyers Authors: Debra Forman View this Book

View more book results for the query "Thornton Law Firm LLP"

Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd v. Bank of America Corp., 09-4302-cv
Publication Date: 2012-02-23
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Cabranes and Wesley, C.JJ., and Koeltl, D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellant Parmalat Capital Finance Limited: J. Gregory Taylor, Allan B. Diamond, J. Benjamin King, Diamond McCarthy LLP. For Appellant Dr. Enrico Bondi: Kathleen M. Sullivan, Peter E. Calamari, Terry L. Wit, Sanford I. Weisburst, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Appellees Grant Thornton International, Inc. and Grant Thornton International Ltd: James L. Bernard, David M. Cheifetz, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY. For Appellee Grant Thornton LLP: Linda T. Coberly, Bruce R. Braun, William P. Ferranti, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL. *1
Case number: 09-4302-cv

Cite as: Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd v. Bank of America Corp., 09-4302-cv, NYLJ 1202543153587, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 21, 2012)Before: Cabranes

September 26, 2011 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
413 minute read
September 21, 2012 |

Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

Notice to the bar.
380 minute read
July 14, 2009 |

'In Re Parmalat' Holdings: Global Exposure for Accounting Firms?

John F. Cambria, a partner at Alston & Bird, and Amber C. Wessels, a senior associate at the firm, write: Two recent Southern District of New York summary judgment decisions in the In re Parmalat Securities Litigation are of potential concern to large global accounting firms that may have found comfort in the Supreme Court's Stone�ridge decision last year. Where a foreign affiliate's conduct creates potential liability, courts have rarely allowed claims to extend to the organization's global umbrella entity or its U.S. operating entity. The new Parmalat decisions, however, allowed securities claims to proceed to trial against both Deloitte & Touche's and Grant Thornton's international and U.S. entities under �20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
12 minute read
Matter of Thornton Naumes, LLP [Athari Law Office]
Publication Date: 2007-01-18
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Contracts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 501051

Decided and Entered: January 18, 2007 501051 ________________________________ In the Matter of the Arbitration between THORNTON & NAUMES, LLP, et al.,

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now