O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33 barred the defendant's cross-claims for contribution, since the statute provides that apportioned damages are not subject to any contribution

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding certain testimony, as the plaintiffs did not disclose the proffered expert testimony in pretrial discovery and declined the trial court's o

The appellant failed to rebut the presumption that the more than 30-day delay in filing a transcript designated to be included in the appellate record was unreasonable and inexcu

The indemnity provision of the agreement between a homeowners' association and a development company was void and unenforceable under O.C.G.A. § 13-8-2 b, since it excused the development company fr

It is highly questionable whether attending law school is a legally cognizable injury or whether giving bad legal advice to the plaintiff would foreseeably lead to his decision to enroll in law scho

The trial court erred in finding that the defendant medical college faculty members were entitled to official immunity on the plaintiffs' medical malpractice claims, as these physicians did not esta

The defendants were not required to affirmatively disprove that they engaged in the particular acts about which the plaintiffs complained in order to prevail on a motion for summary jud

The trial court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants on the plaintiff's claim that they fraudulently induced him to sign an unfair settlement agreement, and that the defendant lawyer

The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the defendants because, even if they breached a duty owed to other travelers on the roads by continuing to pursue a stolen van after the t

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in giving the Allen charge, as the jury sent a note to the trial court on the first day of deliberations indicating that it was deadlocked 11-1 and askin