Search Results

0 results for ''Morrison & Foerster LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
In re WeWork Litig.
Publication Date: 2021-01-06
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William B. Chandler III, Brad D. Sorrels, Lori W. Will, Lindsay Kwoka Faccenda, Leah E. Brenner, Jeremy W. Gagas, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Michael S. Sommer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., New York, NY; David J. Berger, Steven M. Guggenheim, Dylan G. Savage of Wil-son Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. , Palo Alto for plaintiff We Company; William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Sara Toscano, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Seiler, Philippe Adler, Mala Ahuja Harker, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY; William Christopher Carmody, Shawn J. Rabin, Arun Subramanian, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., New York, NY for plain-tiffs Neumann and We Holdings LLC.
For defendant: Robert S. Saunders, Sarah R. Martin, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; George A. Zimmerman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY for The We Co. Elena C. Norman, Rolin P. Bissell, Nicholas J. Rohrer, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Erik J. Olson, of Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, CA; James Bennett, Jordan Eth, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Fran-ciso, CA for defendant SoftBank Group Corp. Michael A. Barlow, E. Wade Houston, Abrams & Baylis LLP, Wilmington, DE; John B. Quinn, Molly Stephens of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant SoftBank Vision Fund.
Case number: D69249

A temporary committee created by a company's board of directors did not have authority to terminate a lawsuit that was filed by an earlier special committee.

In re WeWork Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-11-18
Practice Area: Deals and Transactions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, Sabrina M. Hendershot, Sara Toscano, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Seiler, Philippe Adler, Mala Ahuja Harker, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY; William Christopher Carmody, Shawn J. Rabin, Arun Subramanian, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: William B. Chandler, III, Brad D. Sorrels, Lori W. Will, Lindsay Kwoka Faccenda, Leah E. Brenner, Jeremy W. Gagas, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; David J. Berger, Steven M. Gugen-heim, Dylan G. Savage, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA; Michael S. Sommer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., New York, NY for the special committee of the board of directors of The We Co. Robert S. Saunders, Sarah R. Martin, Arthur R. Bookout, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; George A. Zimmerman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY for The We Co. Elena C. Norman, Rolin P. Bissell, Nicholas J. Rohrer, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Erik J. Olson, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, CA; James Bennett, Jordan Eth, Morri-son & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant SoftBank Group Corp. Michael A. Barlow, E. Wade Houston, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; John B. Quinn, Molly Stephens, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant SoftBank Vision Fund.
Case number: D69193

Plaintiff stated a claim against defendants for breach of contract, but his breach of fiduciary duty claim was duplicative of the contract claim.

B# on Demand LLC v. Spotify Tech. S.A.
Publication Date: 2020-09-23
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; John S. Kyle, Kyle Harris LLP, San Diego, CA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefani E. Shanberg, Jennifer J. Schmidt, Madeleine E. Gully, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: D69126

Patent claim was invalidated as abstract where it merely described computer functions performing routine operations to achieve an abstract goal without providing an actual functional mechanism that would constitute an inventive or improved process for performing those computer functions.

In re WeWork Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-09-02
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor Bouchard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William B. Chandler III, Brad D. Sorrels, Lori W. Will, Lindsay Kwoka Faccenda, Leah E. Brenner, and Jeremy W. Gagas, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Michael S. Sommer, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., New York, NY; David J. Berger, Steven M. Guggenheim, and Dylan G. Savage, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Palo Alto, CA; William M. Lafferty, Kevin M. Coen, Sabrina M. Hendershot, and Sara Toscano, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Seiler, Philippe Adler, and Mala Ahuja Harker, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, NY; William Christopher Carmody, Shawn J. Rabin, and Arun Subramanian, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Robert S. Saunders and Sarah R. Martin, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, DE; George A. Zimmerman, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY; Elena C. Norman, Rolin P. Bissell, and Nicholas J. Rohrer, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Erik J. Olson, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, CA; James Bennett and Jordan Eth, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA; Michael A. Barlow and E. Wade Houston, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; John B. Quinn and Molly Stephens, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case number: D69102

Corporation could not bar specific directors from privileged information provided to the corporation as the director's management authority rendered it a joint client of the corporation and its board.

U.S. ex rel Hanks v. Florida Cancer Specialists
Publication Date: 2020-06-09
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure
Industry: Federal Government | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant United States of America ex rel. Don Hanks: Rob Hennig, Hennig Ruiz & Singh, P.C., Los Angeles, CA. For Appellee United States of America: Bruce R. Ellisen, on the brief, Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, for Richard E. Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Richard P. Donaghue, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, of counsel.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, LLC, Ayub, Sokol, Matzkowitz and Sennabaum, M.D.s, P.A. d/b/a New Hope Cancer Center, Coastal Oncology, P.L., J. Paonessa, M.D., P.A. (Gulfcoast Oncology Associates), and Pasco Hernando Oncology Associates, P.A.: Rachel Kramer, Michael P. Matthews, on the brief, Lawrence M. Krauss, Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, MA. For Defendant-Appellee U.S. Oncology Specialty, LP.: Samuel B. Goldstein, Joshua Hill, Jr., Lena H. Hughes, on the brief, Joseph R. Palmore, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Central Georgia Cancer Care, P.C., Georgia Cancer Specialists I, P.C., and Southeast Georgia Hematology Oncology Associates, P.C.: Jeremy P. Burnette, Akerman LLP, Atlanta, GA. For Defendant-Appellee Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, P.C.: Michael E. Paulhus, Jennifer S. Lewin, on the brief, James W. Boswell, III, King & Spalding LLP, Atlanta, GA.
Case number: 18-3376

District Court Must Decide if Qui Tam Action Is Barred by FCA's Public Disclosure Bar

Appellate Division, Second Department:April 9, 2020
Publication Date: 2020-04-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department:April 9, 2020

In the Matter of Dex Media, Inc. v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the Department of Taxation and Finance of The State of New York, et al.
Publication Date: 2020-02-28
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
Judge: Unsigned Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Mulvey and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 528226

In the Matter of Dex Media, Inc. v. New York

Cirba Inc. v. VMware, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-12-11
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Stark
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kenneth L. Dorsney, Morris James, Wilmington, DE; Courtland L. Reichman, Shawna Ballard, Jennifer P. Estremera, Michael G. Flanigan, Joachim B. Steinberg, Kate Falkenstien, Ariel C. Green, Sarah O. Jorgensen, Christine E. Lehman, Khue V. Ho-ant, Jaime Cardenas-Navia and Wesley L. White, Reichman Jorgensen LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, Atlanta GA, Washington, DC and New York, NY; Gary J. Toman, Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial, Atlanta, GA; Peter J. Ayers, Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, PLLC , Austin, TX for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Anne Shea Gaza, Robert M. Vrana and Samantha G. Wilson of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ar-turo J. González, Michael A. Jacobs, Richard S.J. Hung, Bita Rahebi and Scott F. Llewellyn, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Los Angeles, CA and Denver, CO for defendant.
Case number: D68802

The court construed disputed patent terms based on intrinsic evidence.

Appellate Division, First Department: November 14, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-11-18
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: November 14, 2019

Kurtz v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Publication Date: 2019-11-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Judge: District Judge Jack Weinstein
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff D. Joseph Kurtz: Mark S. Reich, Vincent Serra, Magdalene Economou Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Melville, NY. For Plaintiff Anthony Belfiore: Lester L. Levy, Matthew Insley-Pruitt, Sean M. Zaroogian Wolf Popper LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation: Eamon Paul Joyce, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. Kara L. McCall, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL. For Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation: James M. Bergin, Adam J. Hunt, Morison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY. Brian R. Matsui, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company: Harold P. Weinberger, Eileen M. Patt, Ryan Gander, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY. Cortlin H. Lannin, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, CA.
Case number: 14-CV-1142

Court Certifies Class of Consumers Who Allege That 'Flushable' Wipes Are Not Flushable

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT