0 results for ''Litchfield Cavo''
Lippman, P.J., Williams, Moskowitz, Acosta, JJ. 3888 Index 23262/06 John Sanginito, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Panel Revives Malpractice Claim Against Attorney
A unanimous First Department panel has reinstated a legal malpractice case accusing Manhattan attorney Edward M. Fogarty of depriving a client of a $194,000 judgment through a procedural error.Insurer Allowed To Drop Hot Potato Lawyer
While former Fairfield lawyer John M. Claydon Jr. sits in jail, his former malpractice insurer, Liberty International Underwriters, is free from any obligation to pay any claims against him.Lippman, P.J., Williams, Moskowitz, Acosta, JJ. 3888 Index 23262/06 John Sanginity, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v National Grange Mutual Insurance Company
Saxe, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Richter, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 2837N Index 102850/06 Bridget De Socio, Plaintiff-Respondent, v 136 East 56th Street Owners, Inc.,
Indemnity Provisions: Take My Negligence...Please
Louis F. Eckert, a partner with Litchfield Cavo, and Russel McBrearty, a senior associate with the firm, write: Case law is abundant in finding contractual provisions exempting a party from its own negligence, where there was no gross negligence and no statutory exception applies. The easy case is where such a provision expressly provides for such indemnity. However, some contractual provisions of this nature are written more broadly, and indemnification exempting a party from its own negligence must be shown through interpretation of the provision to be clear and unambiguous.Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, Acosta, JJ. 3392 Index 8512/04 Gustavo Gamarra, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Top Banana, LLC, et al., Defendants, Circle Rubbish of
8718-8719. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, plf-res, v. AFFILIATED FM INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., def, COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY defap — Ford Marrin Esposito Witmeyer & Gleser, LLP, Ne
Traumatic Brain Injury: When Is a Grave Injury Not a 'Grave Injury?'
Louis F. Eckert, a partner at Litchfield Cavo, and Michael Kozoriz, a senior associate at the firm, write that an employer of an injured worker covered by Workers' Compensation is immune from claims for common law indemnification and contribution in a subsequent civil action provided that the worker has not sustained a "grave injury" as that term is defined by Workers' Compensation Law §11.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now