NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Duane Morris'

You can use to get even better search results Duane Morris
January 02, 2007 | National Law Journal

Conflict redux for Duane Morris and McKesson

Duane Morris, ordered out of a local arbitration proceeding last month after being sued by health-care giant McKesson Corp. over a conflict of interest, has filed a motion for a new trial and asked that a permanent injunction against it be lifted.
5 minute read
March 14, 2007 | Corporate Counsel

Duane Morris Wins Conflict Fight

A Georgia judge isn't saying she was wrong when she forbade the Philadelphia-based mega-firm Duane Morris from representing a subsidiary of McKesson Corp. in an Atlanta intellectual property dispute. But, citing changed circumstances, she's lifted her ban on the firm's involvement in the case. Focusing on the circumstances surrounding the conclusion of Duane Morris' involvement in the Pennsylvania matter, the judge concluded that the "hot potato" doctrine did not apply in this instance.
7 minute read
March 01, 2007 | National Law Journal

Firm Fights to Keep Fighting Its Ex-Client

For a Georgia judge Tuesday, the key questions in a dispute involving Duane Morris were: "Did the law firm create a conflict of interest when it agreed to represent a Georgia client against a large corporation, even as it represented another division of the same company in a Pennsylvania bankruptcy? And despite the end of the Pennsylvania case and Duane Morris' withdrawal from it, is the firm still conflicted from the Georgia case?" For an attorney appearing for McKesson Corp., the answer was a firm "yes."
7 minute read
January 02, 2007 | Daily Report Online

Conflict redux for Duane Morris and McKesson

DUANE MORRIS, ordered out of a local arbitration proceeding last month after being sued by health-care giant McKesson Corp. over a conflict of interest, has filed a motion for a new trial and asked that a permanent injunction against it be lifted.McKesson contends that because Duane Morris represented one of its subsidiaries in a Pennsylvania bankruptcy case, it is barred from representing an Atlanta couple suing another McKesson subsidiary.
5 minute read
March 14, 2007 | National Law Journal

Duane Morris wins conflict fight

A Fulton County judge isn't saying she was wrong when she forbade the Philadelphia-based mega-firm Duane Morris from representing a subsidiary of McKesson Corp. in an Atlanta intellectual property dispute. But, citing changed circumstances, she's lifted her ban on the firm's involvement in the case.
7 minute read
March 15, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

Duane Morris Wins Conflict-of-Interest Fight

A Fulton County judge isn't saying she was wrong when she forbade the Philadelphia-based mega-firm Duane Morris from representing a subsidiary of McKesson Corp. in an Atlanta intellectual property dispute. But, citing changed circumstances, she's lifted her ban on the firm's involvement in the case.
7 minute read
September 01, 2006 | Law.com

Conflict Claim Sours Big Firm's Work With Health Giant

Accusations of bad faith, breach of loyalty and attorney activity "bordering on extortion" are flying in Fulton County Superior Court, where medical conglomerate McKesson wants to have the Duane Morris firm disqualified from representing two Georgians against a McKesson subsidiary. At issue is whether Duane Morris' representation of the Georgians against McKesson Information Solutions, while serving as local counsel for two other McKesson subsidiaries in Harrisburg, Pa., is a conflict of interest.
6 minute read
August 31, 2006 | Daily Report Online

Conflict claim sours big firm's work with health giant

7 minute read
January 03, 2007 | National Law Journal

Duane Morris Seeks New Trial Over Alleged Conflict of Interest

Duane Morris, ordered out of a Georgia arbitration proceeding last year after being sued by health care giant McKesson Corp. over a conflict of interest, has filed a motion for a new trial and asked that a permanent injunction against it be lifted. McKesson contends that because Duane Morris represented one of its subsidiaries in a Pennsylvania bankruptcy case, it is barred from representing an Atlanta couple suing another McKesson subsidiary.
5 minute read
September 01, 2006 | Law.com

Conflict Claim Sours Big Firm's Work With Health Giant

Accusations of bad faith, breach of loyalty and attorney activity "bordering on extortion" are flying in Fulton County Superior Court, where medical conglomerate McKesson wants to have the Duane Morris firm disqualified from representing two Georgians against a McKesson subsidiary. At issue is whether Duane Morris' representation of the Georgians against McKesson Information Solutions, while serving as local counsel for two other McKesson subsidiaries in Harrisburg, Pa., is a conflict of interest.
6 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • The Power of Online Reputation Management For Attorneys: A Critical Tool For Law Firms in 2025

    Brought to you by Erase.com

    Download Now

  • The Role of Evolving Support Structures in Optimizing Legal Talent

    Brought to you by BigHand

    Download Now

  • Corporate Monitorship Advisory Services

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • AI-Powered Deposition and Medical Record Summaries: Low Risk, High Reward

    Brought to you by Parrot

    Download Now