NEXT
Search Results

0 results for ''Young Conaway Stargatt''

You can use to get even better search results
May 14, 2020 | Pro Mid Market

Who Got the Work: Struggling Airlines and Pulled Teeth

Smith Gambrell is part of a team advising Latin American airline holding company Avianca Holdings SA as it files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Cassiday Schade is representing two dentists an Illinois inmate claims treated him poorly, and other work from midsize firms.
2 minute read
Anderson v. GI Assocs. of Delaware, P.A.
Publication Date: 2020-05-13
Practice Area: Medical Malpractice
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rocanelli
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy E. Lengkeek, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Bradley J. Goewert and Lorenza A. Wolhar, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D68975

Act of negligent treatment and resulting injury occurring on two separate dates meant that medical malpractice case involved continuum of treatment, requiring that the statute of limitations be measured from the last act in the continuum of treatment.

April 10, 2020 | Delaware Law Weekly

2 Associates Join Young Conaway's IP Litigation Section

Two new associates joined Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor's intellectual property litigation section, the firm announced.
1 minute read
360 Campaign Consulting, LLC v. Diversity Commc'n, LLC
Publication Date: 2020-04-01
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Consulting
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Martin S. Lessner and Alberto E. Chávez, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven J. Cohen and Stella L. Sainty, Watchel Missry LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Brock E. Czeschin, and Megan E. O’Connor, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Mariam W. Tadros and Roya Vasseghi, Rees Broome, PC, Tysons Corner, VA; Kellie Budd, Doumar Martin, PLLC, Arlington, VA for defendants.
Case number: D68926

Claims that arose from defendant's alleged breach of an LLC operating agreement were subject to the agreement's arbitration provision that required arbitration of all disputes among members relating to or arising from the operating agreement.

Schweitzer v. LCR Capital Partners, LLC
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sean A. Meluney and Matthew D. Beebe, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott R. Matthews, Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: James M. Yoch, Jr. and Michael A. Laukaitis II, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lindsay Neinast, Littler Mendelson PC, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: D68925

The court lacked personal jurisdiction over a non-resident company manager, and it granted motions to dismiss as to indemni-fication and defamation claims. However, plaintiff adequately stated a wage claim.

Baggage Airline Guest Servs., Inc. v. Roadie, Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Travel and Tourism
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Neal C. Belgam and Eve H. Ormerod, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan v. Stein and Cole Carson, GrayRobinson, P.A. Tampa, FL for plaintiff.
For defendant: Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, John P. Moy, John P. Pennington, and Darlene K. Tzou, Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: D68918

Motion for attorneys' fees pursuant to the "exceptional case" standard for patent infringement cases denied where plaintiff's patent, although directed to a non-inventive concept, was not indicative of an exceptionally meritless claim, and where plaintiff's litigation conduct was not conclusively indicative of vexatious litigation conduct.

Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Daniel M. Silver and Alexandra M. Joyce McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE
For defendant: Daralyn J. Durie, Adam R. Brausa, Eric C. Wiener and Enenda Hoxha, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA for Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope. Paul B. Gaffney, David I. Berl, Thomas S. Fletcher, Kyle E. Thomason, Teagan J. Gregory, Charles L. McCloud and Kathryn S. Kayali, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Lisa J. Pirozzolo, Emily R. Whelan, Kevin S. Prussia, Andrew J. Danford, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA; Robert J. Gunther Jr., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY; and Nora Passmaneck of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Denver, CO for Genentech, Inc. Melanie K. Sharp and James L. Higgins, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neal C. Belgam, Eve H. Ormerod and Jennifer M. Rutter, Smith Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for Amgen Inc.
Case number: D68923

The court relied on extrinsic evidence to construe a term relating to a fermentation process in this pharmaceutical patent case.

Galderma Lab., L.P. v. Medinter US LLC
Publication Date: 2020-03-25
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Michael J. Flynn, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Mahoney, Mayer Brown LLP, Charlotte, NC; B. Clayton McCraw and Ying-Zi Yang, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Melanie K. Sharp, James L. Higgins and Michelle M. Ovanesian, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Steven Lieberman, Rachel M. Echols, Daniel R. McCallum and Nicole M. DeAbrantes, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: D68922

The court dismissed plaintiff's claim for direct patent infringement, but it denied the motion to dismiss as to the claim for indi-rect infringement.

Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. Hunt Strategic Util. Inv., LLC
Publication Date: 2020-02-05
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Energy
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William M. Lafferty, Thomas W. Briggs, Jr., Daniel T. Menken, and Aubrey J. Morin, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard I. Werder, Jr., Renita N. Sharma, Elisabeth B. Miller, and Ryan A. Rakower, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs and defendants Borealis Power Holdings Inc. and BPC Health Corporation.
For defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Brian S. Yu, and Kevin M. Regan, Richards, Layton & Finger P.A., Wilmington, DE; Neil A. Steiner, Dechert LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff intervenors Cheyne Walk Investments. David C. McBride, Martin S. Lessner, Ryan M. Bartley, and Paul J. Loughman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; J. Christopher Shore and Alive Tsier, White & Case LLP, New York, NY; Aaron Colodny, White & Case LLP, Los Angeles, CA, attorneys for plaintiff intervenors and defendants Sempra Texas Holdings Corp and Sempra Texas Intermediate Holding Co. Peter J. Walsh, Jr., J. Matthew Belger, and Andrew H. Sauder, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jessica B. Pulliam, Baker Botts LLP, Dallas, TX; Vernon Cassin, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, DC; P. Clarkson Collins, Jr., Ian D. McCauley, and Kathleen A. Murphy, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE, attorneys for defendant Hunt Strategic Utility Investment.
Case number: D68862

One party had superior right of first refusal for purchase of offered shares where the parties' shareholders agreement provided that any sale could not violate an investor rights agreement, which granted the party with the superior right its right of first refusal.

January 30, 2020 | Delaware Law Weekly

Judge Finds for C3 and Founder in Shareholder Lawsuit

"Valuing a private company" is "a notoriously difficult thing" to do, Judge Colm Connolly said.
3 minute read

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now