0 results for ''Lerner David Littenberg''
Medpointe Health Care, Inc. v. Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., etc.
The part of defendants' proposed amended pleadings regarding plaintiff's nondisclosure of the prior judicial ruling on an earlier patent fails to state a claim for patent misuse or unclean hands because the earlier patent concerns a product different from that addressed by the present patent; moreover, plaintiff's alleged misconduct did not broaden the patent's physical or temporal scope; the allegations of patent misuse and unclean hands are therefore futile and the motions for leave to amend are denied.Are Federal Appellate Practitioners Free at Last?
A major salvo has been fired in a long-simmering struggle for free expression. In a November edition of West's Supreme Court Reporter were buried proposed rule changes for the federal courts, including the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Among the proposals: lawyers practicing in those courts could not be prohibited from citing to an appellate court the prior decisions of that court that are not formally published.The NLJ Client List | Who Represents Corporate America
Structure Has Little To Do with Structural Obviousness
A recently denied petition for certiorari from a case originating in N.J. questioned the current method for determining the patentability of molecules. Obviousness had previously been found where there was a high degree of structural similarity between a new molecule and a prior art molecule. Now, courts have required a reason, apart from structure, to even select a particular molecule, a so-called "lead compound," as the starting point of the obviousness analysis.The NLJ Client List�Who Represents Corporate America
The National Law Journal and Corporate Counsel magazine surveyed the legal departments of the Fortune 250 companies and reported on which law firms they use most often.Do the Courts Really Understand DNA?
Ideally, judges and laywers would understand not only the IP laws they are applying, but also the science that is protected by those laws. But is that possible in this time of rapidly changing technology?Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)
Notice to the bar.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
From Burnout to Breakthrough: How Technology Enhances Legal Wellness
Brought to you by Nuix
Download Now
The 2024 Benchmark of Ethical Culture Report
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now