T endant could not be held liable for injuries the plaintiff received due to a crane operator's alleged negligence, since the contract between the construction project's general contractor and

The defendants were immune from suit for negligence occurring during their treatment of the decedent for post-operative complications, since their treatment of the decedent as a whole was voluntary

The plaintiff had equal knowledge that the step she slipped on at a restaurant in an amusement park might be wet, since it was raining that day and the steps were located only a few feet from the bu

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the plaintiff's service on the defendant's UM carrier more than 14 months after the limitations period ran was untimely and insuffi

O.C.G.A. § 19-7-5 does not create a private cause of action for the failure to report suspected child

The intervening negligence of the plaintiff's employer was the sole proximate cause of his injury and broke any legally sufficient causal connection between the third-party tortfeasor defendants' al

A jury question remained as to whether defendant attorney exercised ordinary care in preparing an LLC operating agreement for the first plaintiff and another doctor, who partnered to manage a surgic

The evidence showed that the defendants' patrons sometimes arrived or departed on foot or by taxi and the establishments' employees testified that they had no information suggesting that the driver,

The plaintiff's expert affidavit in opposition to the dental malpractice defendant's motion for summary judgment was insufficient to oppose the motion, since the plaintiff's expert did not have pers

The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the plaintiff builders on the defendant real estate developer's counterclaim for breach of contract because the defendant failed to presen