Search Results

0 results for 'Hancock Estabrook'

You can use to get even better search results
Frazier v. Turning Stone Casino, 5:02-CV-131
Publication Date: 2008-11-17
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District
Judge: Frederick Scullin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

District Judge Frederick J. Scullin U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances Attorneys for Plaintiff Frazier H. Todd Bull

Brennan v. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse New York, Inc., 5:09-CV-1015 (GTS/ATB)
Publication Date: 2013-10-22
Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Raymond Schlather, Esq., Diane V. Bruns, Esq., of Counsel, Schlather Stumbar Parks & Salk, LLP, Ithaca, NY. Co-Counsel for Plaintiff: John Scarola, Esq., of Counsel, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL.
For defendant: Counsel for Defendant: Paul M. Hanrahan, Esq., Maureen E. Maney, Esq., Janet D. Callahan, Esq., of Counsel, Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse, NY.
Case number: 5:09-CV-1015 (GTS/ATB)

Cite as: Brennan v. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse New York, Inc., 5:09-CV-1015 (GTS/ATB), NYLJ 1202624466440, at *1 (NDNY, Decided August 14, 2013) 5:09-CV-1015 (GTS

Butterfield v. Caputo, CA 12-02058
Publication Date: 2013-08-20
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Before: Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Valentino, and Whalen, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Respondents: Charles L. Falgiatano of Counsel, Defrancisco & Falgiatano Law Firm, Syracuse.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellants-Respondents: Michael Paul Ringwood of Counsel, Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse. For Defendant-Respondent-Appellant: Alan J. Pierce of Counsel, Gale, Gale & Hunt, LLC, Syracuse, Hancock Estabrook, LLP
Case number: CA 12-02058

Cite as: Butterfield v. Caputo, CA 12-02058, NYLJ 1202615798919, at *1 (App. Div., 4th, Decided July 19, 2013) CA 12-02058 Before: Smith, J.P., Fa

Davis v. Boeheim, CA 13-00451
Publication Date: 2013-10-08
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Before: Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Fahey, and Peradotto, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Mariann Meier Wang of Counsel, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, New York City, and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, California.
For defendant: For Defendants-Respondents: Helen V. Cantwell of Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York City, Hancock Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse, and Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Case number: CA 13-00451

Cite as: Davis v. Boeheim, CA 13-00451, NYLJ 1202622378873, at *1 (App. Div., 4th, Decided October 4, 2013) CA 13-00451 Before: Scudder, P.J., Smi

WEBB, NEIL B. v TORRINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Publication Date: 2005-11-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1354

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1354 CA 05-00896 PRESENT: KEHOE, J.P., MARTOCHE, PI

February 09, 2004 |

Lead Paint Cases Top Agenda of High Court

6 minute read
American Underground Engineering, Inc. Plaintiff v. City of Syracuse, Defendant, 5:00-CV-278
Publication Date: 2012-08-09
Practice Area: Damages
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge Frederick Scullin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Joseph A. Camardo, Jr., Esq., Kevin M. Cox, Esq., of Counsel, Camardo Law Firm PC, Auburn, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: John G. Powers, Esq., James P. Youngs, Esq., of Counsel, Hancock Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Defendant: Joseph Francis Bergh, Esq., James P. McGinty, Esq., of Counsel, City of Syracuse Corporation Counsel, Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Defendant: Thomas M. Carnrike, Esq., of Counsel, Office of Thomas M. Carnrike, Syracuse, NY.
Case number: 5:00-CV-278

Cite as: American Underground Engineering, Inc. v. City of Syracuse, 5:00-CV-278, NYLJ 1202566420385, at *1 (NDNY, Decided August 2, 2012)District Judge F

September 11, 2009 |

Surrogate's Practice and Proceedings

Colleen F. Carew, a court attorney-referee with the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County, and Gary B. Freidman, a partner of Greenfield, Stein & Senior, discuss the importance of the distinction between relationships deemed confidential as a matter of law and those which must be established confidential at trial, a difference a recent Appellate Division panel found so pivotal that it set aside a verdict because of an incorrect jury charge, even though the charge was not objected to.
12 minute read

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT