NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
April 13, 2005 | New York Law Journal

Kasowitz Benson's Pursuit of Legal Fees Goes Forward

3 minute read
April 14, 2005 | Law.com

Kasowitz Benson's Pursuit of Legal Fees Goes Forward

A suit filed by Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman seeking more than $600,000 in unpaid legal fees may turn on whether firing a firm constitutes a form of objecting to its bill. In the underlying case, the firm represented real estate magnate Richard Kramer, who alleged that his new $10 million condominium contained a "killer fungus." Kramer later severed his relationship with the firm, leaving an outstanding balance, and the firm initiated a suit based in part on the account-stated theory.
3 minute read
November 22, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Ineligible In-House Counsel, Multijurisdictional Practitioners and Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

Notice to the bar.
170 minute read
October 26, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys, In-House Counsel and Multijurisdictional Practitioners

Notice to the bar.
128 minute read
Pitcock v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, 107847/09
Publication Date: 2011-01-06
Practice Area: Legal Profession
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Abdus-Salaam, Román, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Balestriere Fariello, New York (John G. Balestriere of counsel), for appellant.
For defendant: Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York (Penny Shane and Sarah Stoller of counsel), for respondents.
Case number: 10784709

Cite as: Pitcock v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, 107847/09, NYLJ 1202477283698, at *1 (App. Div. 1st, Decided January 6, 2011)Before: Saxe, J.P

October 24, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys, In-House Counsel and Multijurisdictional Practitioners

Notice to the bar.
116 minute read
November 16, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Looking Back at Significant 2011 Cases

In his Law Firm Partnership Law column, Arthur J. Ciampi, the managing member of Ciampi LLC, writes that this year saw interesting decisions and actions in New York state and federal courts which addressed issues affecting law firms in the bankruptcy context, challenged the ban on non-lawyer investors in law firms, applied res judicata to limit duplicative claims in law firm partnership disputes, construed law firm agreements concerning amounts owing to former partners, and applied CPLR 3213 in the law firm context.
9 minute read
October 08, 2009 | New York Law Journal

Pitcock v. Kasowitz Benson

Free: Dueling Suits Between Firm, Ex-Partner Are Dismissed
23 minute read
November 21, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

Pro Hac Vice Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2

Notice to the bar.
33 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now