Unitholders plausibly pled general partner's breach of partnership agreement by alleging general partner failed to follow provisions governing resolution of conflict of interest created by general partner's exercise of call right for publicly traded common units.

Plaintiff's claims for equal protection and procedural due process violations were ripe for review, but other matters were not yet ripe.

Termination of Section 8 housing voucher proper where it was not based on a policy or custom leading to a constitutional violation and where recipient had apparent actual notice of the termination hearing.

A release provision in a settlement agreement was not effective to preserve plaintiffs' rights to pursue derivative or direct claims, because they had already sold their shares pursuant to separate repurchase agreements.