Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Wiggin Dana'

You can use to get even better search results
April 24, 2017 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Vitamin Health, Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  Vitamin Health, Inc.v.Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. 2017 WL 1325263Only the Westlaw citation is…
14 minute read
Reif v. Nagy, 161799/15
Publication Date: 2017-04-21
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For ARIS Title Insurance Corporation, appellant: Jonathan M. Freiman of the bar of the State of Connecticut, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT. For respondents: Raymond J. Dowd and Samuel Blaustein of counsel, Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller, LLP, New York. For ARIS Title Insurance Corporation, amicus: Adam Farbiarz of counsel, Wiggins and Dana LLP, New York.
For defendant: For Richard Nagy and Richard Nagy Ltd., appellants: Thaddeus J. Stauber of counsel, Nixon Peabody LLP, New York.
Case number: 161799/15

Panel Allows Stolen Artwork Claims to Move F

TIMOTHY REIF M-408 &plf-res, M-1187. against RICHARD NAGY def-ap, ARTWORKS BY THE ARTIST EGON SCHIELE KNOWN AS WOMAN IN A BLACK PINAFORE, AND WOMAN HIDING HER FACE, def ARIS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, AMICUS CURIAE. TIMOTHY REIF plf-res, —against— RICHARD NAGY def, ARIS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, Proposed Intervenor-ap
Publication Date: 2017-04-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Judge: Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3533-3534

3533-3534. &TIMOTHY REIF M-408 &plf-res, M-1187. against RICHARD NAGY def-ap, ARTWORKS BY THE ARTIST EGON SCHIELE KNOWN AS WOMAN IN A BLACK PINAFORE, AND WOMAN HIDING HER FACE, def ARIS TITL

April 20, 2017 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Bausch & Lomb’s False Advertising Claim Against Vitamin Company Did Not Require Insurer to Defend, Sixth Circuit Decides

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that a false advertising claim brought by Bausch & Lomb against Vitamin Health, Inc., did…
4 minute read
April 14, 2017 |

When Water Cooler Talk Gets Political

There can be no doubt that the recent presidential election was extraordinarily divisive, causing real friction between even the closest friends and relatives.
9 minute read
April 07, 2017 |

Cat Toy Infomercial Leads to 'Bait-and-Switch' Lawsuit

The makers of the Ripple Rug claim a competing company didn't even bother to remove their trademark before selling their cat toy in infomercials.
5 minute read
April 07, 2017 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Cat Toy Infomercial Leads to 'Bait-and-Switch' Lawsuit

The makers of the Ripple Rug claim a competing company didn't even bother to remove their trademark before selling their cat toy in infomercials.
3 minute read
United Sates v. Allstate Insurance, 16-705
Publication Date: 2017-04-07
Practice Area:
Industry: Health Care
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Katzmann, C.J., Pooler and Lynch, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Peter M. Jasen, Buffalo, NY, on the brief, J. Michael Hayes.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees FedEx Corporation, Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Ground Package System Inc., FedEx Freight Corporation, FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc., FedEx Custom Critical, Inc., FedEx Trade Networks Inc., FedEx Supply Chain Systems, Inc., and FedEx Corporate Services, Inc.: John W. Campbell, Federal Express Corporation, Memphis, TN. For Defendants-Appellees Farmers Insurance Exchange, Truck Insurance Exchange, Fire Insurance Exchange, and Foremost Property and Casualty Insurance Company: Lori L. Pines and John P. Mastando III, on the brief, David L. Yohai Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Travelers Insurance Group Holding, Inc., Travelers Property Casualty Corporation, and The Travelers Companies, Inc.: Bryce L. Friedman, Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY; Deborah L. Stein, Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA. For Defendant-Appellee Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.: Jonathan M. Freiman, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT. For Defendants-Appellees J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc., Founders Insurance Company, Founders Insurance Company of Michigan, Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, Republic-Franklin Insurance Company, Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Utica National Insurance Company of Texas, Utica National Insurance Company of Ohio, Utica National Assurance Company, Utica Lloyd's of Texas, Utica Specialty Risk Insurance Company, and Utica National Insurance Group.: Sharon Angelino, Goldberg Segalla LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Erie Insurance Company of New York, Erie Insurance Exchange, Inc., Erie Indemnity Company, and The Erie Insurance Company: Heath J. Szymczak, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Buffalo, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company, Kemper Independence Insurance Company, Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company; and Defendants Kemper Corporation and The Allstate Corporation: Steven M. Levy and Alan S. Gilbert, Dentons US LLP, Chicago IL; Sean C. Cenawood, Dentons US LLP, New York, NY; Sharon Angelino, Goldberg Segalla LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Preferred Mutual Insurance Company: Suzanne O. Galbato, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Progressive Insurance Company and The Progressive Corporation, Inc.: Terrance M. Connors, Connors LLP, Buffalo, NY; Michael K. Loucks, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Boston, MA. For Defendant-Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company: Douglas W. Baruch and Anayansi Rodriquez Carbo, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Washington, D.C.; Dan David Kohane, Hurwitz & Fine, P.C., Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Zurich North America: Michael J. Willett, Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Nationwide General Insurance Company, Nationwide Financial Services Incorporated, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company: Stephen Sozio, Jones Day, Cleveland, OH, Matthew Corcoran, Jones Day, Columbus, OH, Mark C. Davis, Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company: Eric Dranoff, Saretsky Katz & Dranoff, LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee CorePointe Insurance Company f/k/a Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company: Susan L. Swatski, Hill Wallack LLP, Princeton, NJ. For Defendant-Appellee Geico, Insurance.: Barry I. Levy, Cheryl F. Korman, and Brian L. Bank, Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group, and Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.: Kevin J. Fee and Amy C. Gross, Duane Morris LLP, New York, NY, Dennis R. McCoy, Barclay Damon, LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee U-Haul International: Kevin M. Hogan, Phillips Lytle LLP, Buffalo, NY.
Case number: 16-705

Appeals Court Upholds Dismissal of Suit by Lawyer Who Acted in Bad

April 03, 2017 |

The Compliance Monitor Dilemma

David A. Ring and Matthew Cvercko of Wiggin and Dana write: Without doubt, a monitor can be a key ingredient to a company's get-well plan, especially when a company has struggled over time. But with all well-intentioned ideas, the challenge is in implementation, and a creative approach to compensation will better ensure that a monitor's interest are wholly aligned with those of the government and company: the timely implementation of a durable compliance program.
13 minute read
Joseph Umbach, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carrington Investment Partners (US), LP, Carrington Capital Management, LLC, and Bruce Rose, Defendants-Appellants, 15-1285-cv
Publication Date: 2017-03-21
Practice Area:
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Kearse, Cabranes, and Chin, C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: Edward Toptani, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellants: William D. Temko, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, California; Jeffrey R. Babbin, James O. Craven, Wiggin and Dana, New Haven Connecticut, on the brief, Laura K. Lin, Los Angeles, California.
Case number: 15-1285-cv

Cite as: Umbach v. Carrington Investment Partners (US), LP, 15-1285-cv, NYLJ 1202781688602, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided March 13, 2017) 15-1285-cv B

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT