0 results for 'Anderson Kill'
Victims of 2015 Attempted Home Invasion Settle for $1.3M
The three families who were victims of an attempted home invasion in Salem 2 1/2 years ago have agreed on a $1.3 million settlement. Attorneys for the family said the suspect, who left a residential home, later told police he wanted to kill the homeowners.Keys to Successful Property Insurance Recoveries Following Harvey, Irma, Jose and Maria
In the wake of Harvey, Irma, Jose and Maria, the 2017 hurricane season is turning out to be one of the most catastrophic on record.Insurance Coverage for Opioid Litigation
The State of New Jersey and the City of Newark have joined the long and growing list of states, counties, municipalities and Indian Nations that are suing pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors as a result of the opioid epidemic.A Man Who Shot Someone in the Back Was Acquitted. His Lawyer Tells Why.
Why did the jury find a retired mechanic not guilty when he shot someone in the back? The answer is in the why.Transaction Liability Insurance: Where Corporate Deals, Insurance Claims-Handling Intersect
William G. Passannante and Carrie Maylor DiCanio provide some strategies to obtain the coverage purchased and facilitate efficient resolution of R&W insurance disputes.Ahead of NBA Season, Top Players' Lawyer Switches Teams
Christina Guerola Sarchio, a member of the board of directors at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and chair of the firm's class action strike team, has joined Dechert in Washington, D.C.N.Y. Appeals Court Affirms Coverage for Loss That Originated Before Policy Period
An appellate court in New York has affirmed a trial court’s decision finding coverage for a loss that originated, unbeknownst to the insureds, before…Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Union Ins. Co.
Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Rembrandt Enters. v. Ill. Union Ins. Co.United States District Court for the District of MinnesotaSeptember…Pre-Impact Terror and Conscious Pain and Suffering in Wrongful Death Cases
Trial Practice columnists Robert S. Kelner and Gail S. Kelner write that even though the jury awards were reduced in the catastrophic 91st St. crane collapse case, the Appellate Division allowed very significant amounts for the decedents' preimpact terror as the giant crane collapsed, and for their conscious pain and suffering after sustaining catastrophic injuries. This decision should encourage more vigorous examination of damages for preimpact terror and conscious pain and suffering in future wrongful death cases.Four Big Law Firms Grab Roles on Toys 'R' Us Bankruptcy
From bikes to trains to video games, a quartet of large law firms led by Kirkland & Ellis is advising on the Chapter 11 case of toy retail giant Toys “R” Us Inc., which became the latest in a string of struggling brick-and-mortar retailers to file for bankruptcy this year.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making
Brought to you by CARET Legal
Download Now
Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
White Collar Investigation Practice: Global Expertise in Complex Investigations
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now