0 results for 'Wiggin Dana'
Regulatory Oversight of Third-Party Arrangements: Who's Writing the Contract?
John Kennedy, Michelle DeBarge and Timothy Wright of Wiggin and Dana write: Responding to the growing recognition of "third-party risk," regulators are sharpening their focus on how businesses manage third-party providers, to the point of mandating (or at least strongly encouraging) specific types of terms in contracts with parties that access or manage a company's systems or data. Regulators are further extending their reach by mandating cybersecurity policy content and certain risk management practices for third-party provider arrangements.Supreme Court Confirms Expert Testimony Required to Establish Causation in Legal Mal Cases
'Bozelko' provides an important procedural safeguard for Connecticut attorneys facing legal malpractice claims.Courts Have Redefined Hospital Liability for the Malpractice of Independent Physicians
Plaintiffs' efforts to transcend traditional norms of agency or vicarious liability in claims against hospitals have met with mixed results in Connecticut.2016 Litigation Departments of the Year, Mid-Sized Firm Winner: Wiggin and Dana
This year's winner in the mid-sized firm category, Wiggin and Dana, scored a huge win for their client when they got a $35 million judgment thrown out by the Connecticut Supreme Court. At nearly 70 litigators firmwide, Wiggin and Dana handles a variety of matters in Connecticut and beyond.A Celebration of the Best of Connecticut's Legal Community
One of the best things about conducting contests like Litigation Departments of the Year, and Legal Departments of the Year, and New Leaders in the Law is that it gives you a real sense of the breadth and depth of the state's legal talent. And by that standard, the Connecticut legal community has much to be proud of.Stolen Internet Domain Name Leads to Connecticut Lawsuit
A federal judge rejected an order that would have forced two domain registry companies to help a private equity firm recover its web domain.'McDonnell' and the Future of Political Corruption Cases
This decision does not preclude future prosecution but it will require a renewed focus on proving that a bribe was made in exchange for, or with an expectation of, an "official act" in return. Expect to see prosecutors bring what they believe are the right cases with the right jury instructions. But also expect defendants to formulate defenses that rely heavily on the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now