0 results for 'Weber Gallagher Simpson'
Parental Alienation, Hot Family Law Topics On Monday's 'The American Law Journal'
A judge throws three children into juvenile detention because they refuse to see their father. How should courts handle matters of alleged parental alienation?Atlanta Bar Interns Make Good, Partner Promotions
Cynthia Adams and Darius Pattillo each achieved milestones this year, both in their legal careers and as alumni of the Atlanta Bar Association's Summer Law Internship Program, which connects high school students with summer legal jobs and mentors.For Insureds and Insurers, Complex Disputes Are Best Left to the Courts
While binding arbitration can provide a convenient forum for specific types of claims, within the ambit of insurance coverage litigation, there are significant…Building Collapse Jury Hits Sal Army With Majority Liability
Jurors on the Salvation Army building collapse case required roughly one hour deliberating for every month that the liability trial lasted to hand up a verdict assigning three-quarters of liability to the religious organization.Emerging 'Common Experience' Limitation Under 'Tincher'
In Tincher v. Omega Flex, 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court jettisoned Azzarello v. Black Brothers, 391 A.2d 1020 (Pa. 1978), leaving in its wake a "composite" theory of products liability. A plaintiff pursuing a products liability claim in Pennsylvania must now advance a theory premised on either various "risk-utility" factors, such as feasibility of an alternative design, or an ordinary consumer's expectations of a product's safety. Consistent with its tone of restraint throughout Tincher, the Supreme Court avoided endorsing a specific set of circumstances under which either theory should (or could) be applied in practice. In the roughly two years since Tincher was decided, however, courts have begun shaping this issue in the context of claims premised on the "consumer expectation" theory. The possibility of a jury's arbitrary deliberations about a complex product's safety has led some courts to impose a "common experience" limitation to application of the "consumer expectation" theory at trial: Unless it is proven before trial that a product is within a consumer's common experience, a plaintiff must instead prove her claim using the risk-utility theory. This emerging trend will have consequences for how parties prepare and try a products liability claim in Pennsylvania.Duty to Protect Patrons Does Not Extend to Roadway Dangers
A business does not have a duty to protect invitees against the dangers on adjoining roadways, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has ruled in an issue of first impression.For Insureds and Insurers, Complex Disputes Are Best Left to the Courts
While binding arbitration can provide a convenient forum for specific types of claims, within the ambit of insurance coverage litigation, there are significant pitfalls to both insureds and insurers when arbitration is chosen as the dispute resolution forum as opposed to nonbinding mediation or court proceedings. In this article, it is assumed that the parties have unsuccessfully attempted nonbinding mediation and are now faced with the decision of where to prosecute their claims. At least with respect to complex insurance coverage disputes, courts typically represent a superior choice in four key respects: lower comparative total costs; uncompromised resolution on the merits; predictability; and guaranteed appellate review.Opioids, Workers' Comp 'Reform' Attempts On Monday's 'The American Law Journal'
Are opioid drugs, big business and an outdated system killing workers' comp?Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Technology to Make E-Discovery Smarter, Not Harder
Brought to you by Nuix
Download Now
Does Generative AI Have the Power to Transform Legal Services?
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
International Export and Trade Assistance State Law Survey
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
How This Personal Injury Firm Reduced Client Intake Time by 80%
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now