0 results for ''Margolis Edelstein''
Concluding that the facts alleged for the breach of contract claim in the original complaint were similar to those pled in the claim for tortious interference in the amended complaint, the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss finding that defendant was provided sufficient notice of the tortious interference claim to relate back to the original complaint.
Workers File WARN Act Suit Against Furniture Company
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.Personal Injury Top Awards 2023
This year's compilation of the 20 largest personal injury recoveries includes awards reported by the Law Journal between July 29th, 2022, and July 1,…2 Delaware Class Actions, Including Ga. Case, Say Yellow Freight Wrongly Fired 30,000 Without Notice
Both complaints allege Yellow employees were told July 28 they were being terminated that day, violating the federal WARN Act requirement for 60 days advance notice of a mass layoff.Pair of Delaware Class Actions Say Yellow Freight Wrongly Fired 30,000 Without Notice
Both complaints allege Yellow employees were told July 28 they were being terminated that day, violating the federal WARN Act requirement for 60 days advance notice of a mass layoff.View more book results for the query "'Margolis Edelstein'"
Negligence and tortious interference claims against insurer brought by insurance agent failed where insurer lacked specific knowledge of the business relationship between the agent and the agent's client and would not have reason to know they would be liable for damage arising from the client's termination of the agent's services following the insurer's policy cancellation.
Superior Court correctly applied Sutton rule to bar landlord's insurer from pursuing subrogation against tenants who negligently damaged the property, where the lease contained no provision demonstrating that the landlord and tenant expressly intended for the tenant to obtain their own insurance or to be barred from coverage under the landlord's policy.
Insurance agent's professional negligence claims against insurance provider arising from the agent's termination by his client failed where agent could not allege a duty of care by the provider, which had no reason to know that the agent's continued retention by his client would be conditioned on the provider's performance under the insurance policy.
3rd Circuit Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction Over Magnuson-Moss Warranty Class Actions
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has clarified that neither the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) nor traditional diversity requirements can serve as a basis for federal jurisdiction over Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) class actions.$10.4M Verdict Over Fatal Pedestrian Collision Includes Award Against Insurance Brokers
The plaintiff's memo said Lipschutz relied on the Fonner defendants for their expertise regarding insurance, and believed the underinsurance coverage he'd purchased included coverage in the event that he was not driving the vehicle.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now