Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Morrison & Foerster LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
In Re Rebekah Gee
Publication Date: 2019-11-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Rights | Government
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-30353

Plaintiffs brought a "cumulative-effects challenge" to Louisiana's laws regulating abortion, arguing the provisions taken as a whole were unconstitutional.

N.Y.S. Citizens' Coalition for Children v. Poole
Publication Date: 2019-08-26
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Family Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Debra Ann Livingston
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Grant J. Esposito, Adam J. Hunt, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY; Brian R. Matsui, Esq., Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Caroline A. Olsen, Assistant Solicitor General; Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General; Steven C. Wu, Deputy Solicitor General for Letitia James, Attorney General for the State of New York.
Case number: 14-2919

Dissent Rejects Determination CWA Creates §1983 Right to Sue for Child-Rearing Costs

S.I.SV.EL. Societa Italiana Per Lo Sviluppo Dell' Elettronica S.P.A. v. Rhapsody Int'l Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-06-19
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O'Byrne, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE for defend-ants Rhapsody Int'l and Spotify USA Inc. Patrick Bageant, Hollystone Law, Boise, ID for defendant Rhapsody Int'l. Stefani E. Shanberg and Michael J. Guo, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant Spotify USA Inc.
Case number: D68605

Defendants were not entitled to summary judgment, because genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the patent involved an inventive concept.

Charles v. Orange County
Publication Date: 2019-05-31
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Gerard Lynch
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants Michelet Charles and Carol Small: Thomas C. Rice, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on the brief, Daniel J. Stujenske, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, Laura F. Redman, Antony P. F. Gemmell, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Orange County, State of New York, Orange County Sheriff's Department, Orange County Department of Mental Health and Carmen Elizondo, Former Clinic Director, Orange County Correctional Facility, in her individual capacity: Anthony Cardoso, Orange County Attorney's Office, Goshen, NY. For Amici Curiae American Psychiatric Association, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, American Psychological Association, American Medical Association, National Association of Social Workers, American Public Health Association, and Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Ira A. Burnim, Judge David C. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Washington, DC, on the brief, Aaron M. Panner, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC. For Amici Curiae The Bronx Defenders, Brooklyn Defender Services, Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement, Detention Watch Network, The Florida Justice Institute, Inc., Human Rights First, Immigrant Defense Project, The Immigrant Rights Clinic of Washington Square Legal Services, Inc., at NYU Law School, the Kathryn O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, The Legal Aid Society of New York, The Prison Law Office, Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, and the Urban Justice Center Mental Health Project, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellants: Jamie A. Levitt, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY. For Amicus Curiae New York State Sheriffs' Association, in support of Defendants-Appellees: Alexander M. Wilson, New York State Sheriffs' Association, Albany, NY.
Case number: 17-3506-pr

Civil Detainees Alleged Discharge Planning an Essential Part of Their In-Custody Care

In re Fitbit, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litig.
Publication Date: 2018-12-26
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Consumer Products | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Peter B. Andrews, Craig J. Springer and David M. Sborz, Andrews & Springer LLC, Wilmington, DE; Jessica Zeldin of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess, P.A., Wilmington, DE, Melinda A. Nicholson and Michael R. Robinson, Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC, Madisonville, LA; Robert C. Schubert of Schubert Jonckheer & Kolbe LLP, San Francisco, CA; Edward F. Haber of Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Elena C. Norman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP; Wilmington, DE; Jordan Eth, Anna Erickson White and Ryan M. Keats, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: D68405

Plaintiffs demonstrated demand futility, and their allegations were sufficient to state a claim against the company's board of directors for breach of fiduciary duty.

Piper Jaffray, Inc. v. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
Publication Date: 2018-12-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Eric Lopez Schnabel and Alessandra Glorioso, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Wilmington, DE; Thomas P. Swigert and Phil Steger of Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN for plaintiff.
For defendant: Elena C. Norman and Benjamin M. Potts, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Judson E. Lobdell of Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendant.
Case number: D68386

Plaintiff adequately stated a claim for breach of the parties' engagement letter involving financial services, but discovery was necessary to determine factual issues.

Drone Racing League Inc. v. DR1 LLC
Publication Date: 2018-11-30
Practice Area: Trademarks
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Jamie A. Levitt, Sarah L. Prutzman, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, New York
For defendant: Madeleine E. Gully, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, California; For the Defendants: Eric Ostroff, Solomon B. Genet, Meland Russin & Budwick, P.A., Miami, Florida; Justin B. Perri, Blackstone Law Group LLP, New York, New York.
Case number: 18 cv 4093

Drone Race Promoter's Trademark Infringement Claims Against Competitor Proceed

Appellate Division, First Department: October 30, 2018
Publication Date: 2018-10-31
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department:October 30, 2018

U.S. ex rel. Piacentile v. Amgen Inc.
Publication Date: 2018-09-25
Practice Area: Government
Industry: Health Care | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Sterling Johnson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Relators Joseph Piacentile & Kevin B. Kilcoyne: By: David S. Stone, Robert A. Magnanini, Amy W. Wagner & Daniel Mee, Stone & Magnanini LLP, Short Hills, New Jersey
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant U.S. Oncology, Inc: By: Carl H. Lowenstein, Jr., & Joseph Alexander Lawrence, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY
Case number: 04-CV-3983

Relators' Qui Tam Action Dismissed for Failure to State Claim Under False Claims Act

June 22, 2018 | The American Lawyer

Mansfield Rule 2.0 Aims to Boost Law Firms' Diversity Efforts

Launching next month with close to 50 law firms already on board, the updated Mansfield Rule will extend to LGTBQ+ attorneys and commit firms to do more to enhance diversity in leadership.
1 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT