0 results for 'Bailey & Glasser LLP'
There was no presumption of confidentiality for books and records produced in response to a §220 request, nor was a requesting stockholder required to show exigent circumstances to avoid an indefinite confidentiality obligation.
Fraud claims arising from investment in business sustained where plaintiff alleged defendant made specific misrepresentations to induce plaintiff's investment.
Appellate Division, Second Department:May 22, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department:May 22, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department: April 24, 2019
The state adequately alleged claims against manufacturers and distributors of opioids, but the court dismissed public nuisance, civil conspiracy and unjust enrichment claims.
Appellate Division, Second Department: April 25, 2018
District Judge I. Leo Glasser U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Counsel for the Plaintiff: Bruce S. Rosenberg, Rosenberg Law, P.C. Counsel for the
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates
Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®
Download Now
AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now
Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now
2025 State Legislative Sessions
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now