Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Burnham Brown'

You can use to get even better search results
January 21, 2020 | Law.com

Compliance Hot Spots: William Barr's Front Office | CFIUS Rules: Takeaways | DOJ Fights 'Filter Team' Ruling | Apple's Drone Lobbying | New Moves, and More

Welcome to Compliance Hot Spots, our regulatory, compliance and white-collar briefing. We're looking at some Main Justice personnel moves this week, and scroll down for new and notable federal lobbying disclosures in Who Got the Work. Plus, some takeaways on the final CFIUS rules. Thanks for reading!
8 minute read
Mashburn v. Mashburn
Publication Date: 2019-12-23
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Rickman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Samuel Robinson, (Wolford & Robinson), Chattanooga, for appellant.
For defendant: Rickie Brown, (Attorney at Law), Dalton, Julia Hill, (The Law Office of Rick Brown), Dalton, for appellee. Joel Thames, (Attorney at Law), Dalton, for other party.
Case number: A19A1616

Trial Court Must Consider Recent Evidence Relevant to Questions of Mother's Visitation and Parenting Plan

December 13, 2019 | The Recorder

On the Move: Tracking the Ins and Outs of California Lawyers

New hires and promotions from across the California legal market.
3 minute read
November 25, 2019 | National Law Journal

'No One Is Above the Law': Judge Says Donald McGahn Must Comply With House Subpoena for His Testimony

U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized the Justice Department's stance that a court could not resolve the case.
5 minute read
Longino v. Longino
Publication Date: 2019-11-12
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Barnes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Alfred Chang, (The Law Office of Alfred Chang), Dahlonega, for appellant.
For defendant: Jeffrey Cox, (Attorney at Law), Dawsonville, for appellee.
Case number: A19A1386

Court vacates the modification of a child custody arrangement because trial court failed to elucidate any material change in the children's circumstances

October 31, 2019 | National Law Journal

'What Does Checks and Balances Mean?': Judge Frustrated by DOJ Arguments Against McGahn Testimony

At times, Jackson's voice rose and seemed to express frustration as she took issue with the claim that McGahn couldn't be sued in his capacity as a former executive branch official, because of the protections offered to those in the branch.
5 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department:October 22, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-10-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department:October 22, 2019

Haesun Park-Poaps v. Poaps
Publication Date: 2019-10-14
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Barnes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Eric Ballinger, (Attorney at Law), Canton, for appellant.
For defendant: Sally Fox, Bridget Cardinale, (Fox Legal, LLC), Decatur, for appellee.
Case number: A19A2032

Family Law Court's Pro-Rata Division of Costs of Children's Extracurricular Activities Required Written Findings

In re del Valle Ruiz
Publication Date: 2019-10-11
Practice Area: Discovery
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Peter Hall
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Petitioners-Appellants Antonio del Valle Ruiz, et al: C. Harker Rhodes IV, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, Lauren F. Friedman, Lucila I.M. Hemmingsen, Joseph Myer Sanderson, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Javier H. Rubinstein, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Chicago, IL.
For defendant: For Petitioners-Appellants-Cross-Appellees Pacific Investment Management Company LLC and Anchorage Capital Group, LLC: Peter Evan Calamari Bento, on the brief, David Mader, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY. For Respondents-Appellees Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Holdings U.S.A., Inc., and Santander Bank, N.A. and Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant Santander Investment Securities Inc: Samuel A. Danon, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Miami, FL, Johnathon E. Schronce, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Richmond, VA, Joseph J. Saltarelli, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, New York, NY, on the brief, Elbert Lin, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Richmond, VA.
Case number: 18-3226

No Per Se Bar on 28 USC §1782's Extraterritorial Application

Appellate Division,First Department: September 24, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-09-26
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Cases Decided
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division,First Department: September 24, 2019

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT