The trial court properly granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's retaliation claim because she failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation but partially erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's defamation claims, as a genuine issue of material fact remained with respect to one of the claims.

In a high-profile murder case, the Supreme Court vacated a gag order that restrained certain classes of persons from making extrajudicial, public statements on certain subjects related to the case for so long as it remained pending, holding that the record did not reveal circumstances sufficiently exceptional to warrant such a restraint.

The trial court and Court of Appeals applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing attorney's action to compel hospital to provide him with access to certain documents in response to his request under the Georgia Open Records Act.

Federal law preempted plaintiff's negligence claims against railroad companies arising after a train derailed and caused a chemical spill on plaintiff's pro

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying sheriff's motion to quash a subpoena filed by probationer to obtain the sheriff's department's investigative file for charges upon which State

Two trial courts properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's breach of contract suits for lack of venue based on Virginia choice-of-forum clauses in the cont

The trial court properly found that documents an attorney requested related to a hospital's acquisition of four private entities were not subject to the Georgia Open Records Act, because the hospita