NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Nicolson Law Group'

You can use to get even better search results
December 15, 2004 |

New York Court of Appeals Roundup

Roy L. Reardon and Mary Elizabeth McGarry, partners at Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, discuss three recent decisions where the Court rejected a presumption of child neglect, found that a single commissioner on an election board can challenge conduct that disadvantages his political party, and resolved the issue of when a brain injury constitutes a "grave injury" for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Law.
9 minute read
August 16, 2007 |

Closing attorneys see red after receiving bad checks from HomeBanc Mortgage

Correction appended: See below for a correction to this story.JOHN K. HALEY, a real estate closing attorney in Buford, left work July 31 thinking the HomeBanc mortgages he'd closed earlier that day had cleared.That turned out not to be true. Haley was one of dozens of Atlanta-area real estate closing attorneys who received bounced checks last month from HomeBanc Mortgage Corp.
8 minute read
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company a/s/o Hulis & Saliha Mavruk, Plaintiff v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Defendant, 10-CV-1351
Publication Date: 2012-08-15
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Joseph Bianco
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented: by Jeffrey J. White, Craig A. Raabe, Jeffrey J. White and Laura A. Torchio of Robinson & Cole LLP, Hartford, CT.
For defendant: Defendant is represented: by Cheryl M. Nicolson, Melissa L. Yemma of Nicholson Associates LLC, Media, PA.
Case number: 10-CV-1351

Cite as: Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., 10-CV-1351, NYLJ 1202567271836, at *1 (EDNY, Decided July 30, 2012)District Judge Jo

Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,
Publication Date: 2012-01-25
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Non-Jury Settlement Trl PtMoses v. Dumont (22988/09)—Denied Short Form OrderAshpis v. Caparatta (24796/08)—Granted Short Form Order

Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,
Publication Date: 2012-12-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Non-Jury Settlement Trl PtMedina v. Edwards (28356/10)—Motion GrantedJustice Rachel A

Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,
Publication Date: 2012-02-07
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Non-Jury Settlement Trl PtUs Bank v. Collymore (1578/08)—Motion GrantedJustice Rachel Amy AdamsIwanusa v. Iwanusa Jr. (5891/

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now