NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Schnader Harrison Segal'

You can use to get even better search results
De'L. A. v. City of New York
Publication Date: 2018-01-03
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Ellen Gesmer
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For appellant: Judy C. Selmeci of counsel, Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York.
For defendant: For Joseph, L. De'L. A. and Deborah A., respondents-appellants: Brian J. Shoot, Gregory J. Cannata, and Gregory J. Cannata & Associates of counsel, Sullivan Papain Block McGarth & Cannavo, P.C., New York.; For Yolanda Jenkins, respondent-appellant: Roberta L. DiGangi, Brooklyn.; For the City of New York, respondent: Bruce M. Strikowsky of counsel, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, New York.; For Milcia Pineda, respondent: Allyson P. Stavis of counsel, Koster Brady & Nagler LLP, New York.
Case number: 8056/04

Issue Exists if Agency's Negligence Proximately Caused Infant Foster Child's Injury

Universal Investment Advisory SA v. Bakrie Telecom PTE, Ltd., 652890/14
Publication Date: 2017-09-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge: Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For appellants-respondents: James W. Perkins and Anne C. Reddy of counsel, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York.
For defendant: For respondents-appellants and respondents: Theodore L. Hecht of counsel, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, New York.
Case number: 652890/14

Personal Jurisdiction Dismissal Reversed On Allegations of Individuals' Kno

Universal Investment Advisory SA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, -against- Bakrie Telecom PTE, Ltd., et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants, PT Bakrie & Brothers TBK, et al., Defendants-Respondents
Publication Date: 2017-08-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Judge: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Universal Investment Advisory SA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Respondents, -against- Bakrie Telecom PTE, Ltd., et al., Defen Respondents-Appellants, PT Bakrie & Brothers TBK, et al., Defe

UNIVERSAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY SA Plaintiffs-Appellants-res, v. BAKRIE TELECOM PTE, LTD. Defendants-res-ap, PT BAKRIE & BROTHERS TBK def-res
Publication Date: 2017-08-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Judge: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Gische, Kapnick, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 3579-3580A

3579-3580A. UNIVERSAL INVESTMENT ADVISORY SA Plaintiffs-Appellants-res, v. BAKRIE TELECOM PTE, LTD. Defendants-res-ap, PT BAKRIE & BROTHERS TBK def-res — Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York (

Windsor Securities v. Arent Fox, 16 Civ. 1533
Publication Date: 2017-08-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: Magistrate Judge Gabriel Gorenstein
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 16 Civ. 1533 (GBD) (GWG)

Arent Fox Loses Bid for Client's Communications in Malpractic

N.M.F. v. S.C., 16/9472
Publication Date: 2017-03-03
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Monroe County
Judge: Justice Richard Dollinger
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: Francis Affronti, Esq., Rochester, New York.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendant: Richard Coia, Esq., Rochester, New York.
Case number: 16/9472

Cite as: N.M.F. v. S.C., 16/9472, NYLJ 1202780318275, at *1 (Sup., MO, Decided February 21, 2017) CASENAME N.M.F., Plaintiff v. S.C., Defendant 16

Stock v. Schnader Harrison Segal &; Lewis, 651250/13
Publication Date: 2016-07-05
Practice Area:
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellants: Frederick B. Warder III and Jesse A. Townsend of counsel, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York.
For defendant: For Respondent: Jordan M. Kam of counsel, The Roth Law Firm, PLLC, New York. Ralph M. Stone of counsel, Stone Bonner & Rocco LLP, New York, Amar D. Sarwal, Washington, DC, of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, and Wendy E. Ackerman, Washington, DC, of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, for Association of Corporate Counsel. Amicus Curiae. Francis J. Menton, Jr. of counsel, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, New York, David Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, Paul Spagnoletti of counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, James M. Bergin of counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, New York, David G. Keyko of counsel, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, Irwin H. Warren of counsel, for Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, David Polk & Wardwell LLP, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, et al., Amici Curiae.
Case number: 651250/13

Cite as: Stock v. Schnader, 651250/13, NYLJ 1202761507938, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided June 30, 2016) CASE NAMEKeith Stock, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Schnader

In re Scheer
Publication Date: 2016-04-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding Before: Marsha S. Berzon and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges and Algenon L. Marbley,* District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Marilyn S. Scheer (argued), Woodland Hills, California, pro se Appellant.
For defendant: Michael von Loewenfeldt (argued), Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, San Francisco, California; Kevin W. Coleman and Todd B. Holvick, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellees.
Case number: No. 14-56622

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 3929 IN RE MARILYN S. SCHEER, Debtor, MARILYN S. SCHEER, Appellant,

In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 40000/88
Publication Date: 2015-07-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Moskowitz, Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiff-Respondents: All Nycal Cases.
For defendant: Defendants-Appellants: A.O Smith Water Products Co., et al., Defendants, Crane Co., et al. For Crane Co., appellant: Michael J. Ross of the bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, K & L Gates LLP, Pittsburg, PA. For Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., appellant: E. Leo Milonas of counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, New York. and Kerry A. Brennan of counsel, Brennan Law Firm PLLC, New York.
Case number: 40000/88

Cite as: In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 40000/88, NYLJ 1202731835505, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided July 9, 2015) 4000

The Following Motion
Publication Date: 2015-06-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: First Judicial Department, Appellate Division
Judge: Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sweeny, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

M-2081. PEOPLE v. CAPPELLAN, OMARM-2084. PEOPLE v. ESTEBAN, ALEJANDROM-2085. PEOPLE v. FELDER, HUBERTM-2086. PEOPLE v. HAYES, ANGELOM-2087. PEOPLE v. JIMENEZ,

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now