0 results for 'Burns'
Board erred in affirming Workers' Compensation Judge and finding claimant truck driver's "mental/mental" injury arose from an abnormal working condition, a fire in a tractor trailer truck, because claimant acknowledged he could anticipate a truck fire, had been trained how to respond to a fire and the relatively minor fire that was quickly extinguished was not an "extraordinarily unusual and distressing" employment event for a truck driver. Reversed.
Defendant moved to dismiss the counts under 18 U.S.C. §§844(i) and 844(n) and alleged negligence by fire department personnel contributed to their injuries and government filed a motion in limine to exclude what it asserted were improper defenses and court found the sentence enhancement provisions of § 844(i) required the government to submit to the jury and prove beyond a reasonable doubt both actual, but-for causation and proximate causation and actual causation meant government had to show that defendant's conduct was an independen
RLUIPA Suiut Remanded; Finality Attached to Zoning Ruling, Article III Traceability Met
In the Matter of the Claim of Jerry Faisca v. New York
View more book results for the query "Burns "
Preliminary Injunction Only Partly Granted; Its Scope Limited to SDNY, EDNY
Ga. Court Set to Decide Whether Staffing Agency or Insurer Must Pay Out Workers' Comp Claims
"Opposing counsel will literally talk about every other moment except the moment of injury," the appellants argued, while the appellees pointed out that the case has now been litigated by six different courts through which they have thus far prevailed.Jury Awards $14M Verdict in Plaintiffs' Second Bid to Try Wrongful Death Claims Against CHOP
CHOP had previously evaded liability in the case, over the death of a 4-year-old boy, when a 2020 trial ended in a nonsuit in its favor.Madison Square Garden 'Lawyer Ban' Remains Intact as Lawsuits Dwindle
"I was like Moses; I carried them to the promised land even if I didn't go in," said Larry Hutcher, whose firm Davidoff Hutcher & Citron was the first to sue over the ban. They have since dropped the suit.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now